This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61999CJ0385
Judgment of the Court of 13 May 2003.#V.G. Müller-Fauré v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij OZ Zorgverzekeringen UA and E.E.M. van Riet v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ZAO Zorgverzekeringen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Centrale Raad van Beroep - Netherlands.#Freedom to provide services - Articles 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) and 60 of the EC Treaty (now Article 50 EC) - Sickness insurance - System providing benefits in kind - System of agreements - Medical costs incurred in another Member State - Prior authorisation - Criteria - Justification.#Case C-385/99.
Judgment of the Court of 13 May 2003.
V.G. Müller-Fauré v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij OZ Zorgverzekeringen UA and E.E.M. van Riet v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ZAO Zorgverzekeringen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Centrale Raad van Beroep - Netherlands.
Freedom to provide services - Articles 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) and 60 of the EC Treaty (now Article 50 EC) - Sickness insurance - System providing benefits in kind - System of agreements - Medical costs incurred in another Member State - Prior authorisation - Criteria - Justification.
Case C-385/99.
Judgment of the Court of 13 May 2003.
V.G. Müller-Fauré v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij OZ Zorgverzekeringen UA and E.E.M. van Riet v Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ZAO Zorgverzekeringen.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Centrale Raad van Beroep - Netherlands.
Freedom to provide services - Articles 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) and 60 of the EC Treaty (now Article 50 EC) - Sickness insurance - System providing benefits in kind - System of agreements - Medical costs incurred in another Member State - Prior authorisation - Criteria - Justification.
Case C-385/99.
European Court Reports 2003 I-04509
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:270
«(Freedom to provide services – Articles 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) and 60 of the EC Treaty (now Article 50 EC) – Sickness insurance – System providing benefits in kind – System of agreements – Medical costs incurred in another Member State – Prior authorisation – Criteria – Justification)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(EC Treaty, Art. 59 (now, after amendment, Art. 49 EC) and Art. 60 (now Art. 50 EC))
(EC Treaty Art. 59 (now, after amendment, Art. 49 EC) and Art. 60 (now Art. 50 EC))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
13 May 2003 (1)
((Freedom to provide services – Articles 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) and 60 of the EC Treaty (now Article 50 EC) – Sickness insurance – System providing benefits in kind – System of agreements – Medical costs incurred in another Member State – Prior authorisation – Criteria – Justification))
In Case C-385/99, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between V.G. Müller-Fauréand
Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij OZ Zorgverzekeringen UA, and between E.E.M. van Riet and Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ZAO Zorgverzekeringen, on the interpretation of Article 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) and Article 60 of the EC Treaty (now Article 50 EC),THE COURT,,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij OZ Zorgverzekeringen UA, represented by J.K. de Pree; Onderlinge Waarborgmaatschappij ZAO Zorgverzekeringen, represented by R. Out, acting as Agent; the Netherlands Government, represented by H.G. Sevenster; the Danish Government, represented by J. Molde; the Spanish Government, represented by N. Díaz Abad; the Irish Government, represented by A. Collins BL; the Finnish Government, represented by T. Pynnä, acting as Agent; the United Kingdom Government, represented by D. Lloyd-Jones QC, and the Commission, represented by H. Michard, acting as Agent, and H.M.H. Speyart, at the hearing on 10 September 2002,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 22 October 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT,
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Centrale Raad van Beroep by order of 6 October 1999, hereby rules:
Rodríguez Iglesias |
Wathelet |
Schintgen |
Timmermans |
Edward |
La Pergola |
Jann |
Macken |
Colneric |
von Bahr |
Cunha Rodrigues |
|
R. Grass |
G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias |
Registrar |
President |