This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/140/64
Case T-136/07: Action brought on 30 April 2007 — Colgate-Palmolive v OHIM — CMS Hasche Sigle (VISIBLE WHITE)
Case T-136/07: Action brought on 30 April 2007 — Colgate-Palmolive v OHIM — CMS Hasche Sigle (VISIBLE WHITE)
Case T-136/07: Action brought on 30 April 2007 — Colgate-Palmolive v OHIM — CMS Hasche Sigle (VISIBLE WHITE)
IO C 140, 23.6.2007, p. 39–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.6.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 140/39 |
Action brought on 30 April 2007 — Colgate-Palmolive v OHIM — CMS Hasche Sigle (VISIBLE WHITE)
(Case T-136/07)
(2007/C 140/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler, H. Harmeling and K.-U. Plath, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: CMS Hasche Sigle (Cologne, Germany)
Form of order sought
|
— |
The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal dated 15 February 2007 shall be annulled; |
|
— |
the Court shall confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division and declare that the Community trade mark No 802 793 ‘VISIBLE WHITE’ remains registered; |
|
— |
the applicant receives an award of costs in respect of the request for a declaration of invalidity, a reversal of the award of the costs made in the Board's decision, and an award of costs in respect of this application. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘VISIBLE WHITE’ for goods in class 3 — Community trade mark No 802 793
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: CMS Hasche Sigle
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision and declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly considered both the element ‘VISIBLE’ and the element ‘WHITE’ as descriptive in relation to ‘toothpaste’ as well as ‘mouthwash’ and considered the combination as a whole descriptive and devoid of distinctive character.