This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0269
Case T-269/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Pšonka v Council
Case T-269/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Pšonka v Council
Case T-269/20: Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Pšonka v Council
IO C 222, 6.7.2020, p. 33–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 222/33 |
Action brought on 5 May 2020 — Pšonka v Council
(Case T-269/20)
(2020/C 222/36)
Language of the case: Czech
Parties
Applicant: Viktor Pavlovyč Pšonka (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/373 of 5 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/370 of 5 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, (2) in so far as that decision and that regulation apply to the applicant; |
— |
declare that the Council of the European Union is to bear its own costs and order it to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to good administration
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the applicant’s right to property
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights as guaranteed by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
|