Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TA0368

    Case T-368/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS — Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    IO C 310, 2.8.2021, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    2.8.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 310/25


    Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS)

    (Case T-368/20) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS - Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    (2021/C 310/31)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Smiley Miley, Inc. (Nashville, Tennessee, United States) (represented by: J.B. Devaureix, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Cyrus Trademarks Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Trademarks and Smiley Miley.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4);

    2.

    Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.


    Top