Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0466

    Case T-466/18: Action brought on 25 July 2018 — Eurolamp v EUIPO (EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology)

    IO C 341, 24.9.2018, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    25/07/2018
    Date lodged:
    25/07/2018
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Gréigis
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    24.9.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 341/25

    Action brought on 25 July 2018 — Eurolamp v EUIPO (EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology)

    (Case T-466/18)

    (2018/C 341/36)

    Language of the case: Greek

    Parties

    Applicant: Eurolamp AVEE Eisagogis kai Emporias Lamptiron (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: A. Argyriadis, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: Application for registration in the European Union of the figurative colour mark ‘EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology’ representing a combination of the following colours: green and black — Application for registration No 16 180 821

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 May 2018 in Case R 1359/2017-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    —

    hold this action to be admissible;

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    uphold in its entirety the application No 16 180 821 for trade mark registration in the European Union with respect to all the claimed goods;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001;

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.
    Top