This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0660
Case T-660/17: Action brought on 28 September 2017 — Miralla Inversiones v Commission and SRB
Case T-660/17: Action brought on 28 September 2017 — Miralla Inversiones v Commission and SRB
Case T-660/17: Action brought on 28 September 2017 — Miralla Inversiones v Commission and SRB
IO C 424, 11.12.2017, p. 42–43
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 28/09/2017
- Date lodged:
- 28/09/2017
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Spáinnis
- Type of procedure:
- Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Inapplicability request 32014R0806 airteagal 15
- Inapplicability request 32014R0806 airteagal 18
- Inapplicability request 32014R0806 airteagal 20
- Inapplicability request 32014R0806 airteagal 21
- Inapplicability request 32014R0806 airteagal 22
- Inapplicability request 32014R0806 airteagal 24
- Annulment request 32017D1246
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
11.12.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 424/42 |
Action brought on 28 September 2017 — Miralla Inversiones v Commission and SRB
(Case T-660/17)
(2017/C 424/62)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Miralla Inversiones, S.L. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)
Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
|
— |
Annul Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
|
— |
Annul Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme of Banco Popular Español, S.A.; |
|
— |
Where appropriate, declare Articles 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and/or 24 of Regulation No 806/2014 inapplicable, in accordance with Article 277 TFEU; |
|
— |
Order SRB and the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
