Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TN0200

    Case T-200/16: Action brought on 29 April 2016 — Gfi PSF v Commission

    IO C 222, 20.6.2016, p. 34–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    29/04/2016
    Date lodged:
    29/04/2016
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Fraincis
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean chun cúiteamh a ghnóthú, Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    20.6.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 222/34

    Action brought on 29 April 2016 — Gfi PSF v Commission

    (Case T-200/16)

    (2016/C 222/42)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Gfi PSF Sàrl (Leudelange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    —

    annul the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union of 2 March 2016, the decision of 16 March 2016 and the decision of 22 April 2016 rejecting the applicant’s tender submitted in the context of European public contract No 10573 ‘Development, maintenance, evolution and support services for Internet sites based on SharePoint technology and drafting services for publication on the Internet’, published by notice of 17 December 2015, for Lot No 1 with a total value of EUR 2 005 704 over four years;

    —

    order the Office to pay the applicant compensation for damage suffered in the amount of EUR 415 000;

    —

    order the Office to pay the expenses incurred by the applicant and by the Office.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, alleging an infringement of the obligation to state reasons and an infringement of Article 111(4)(b) of Regulation No 2015/1929 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 October 2015 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ 2015 L 286, p. 1).

    Top