This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TB0916
Case T-916/16: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2018 — Winkler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Measure not open to challenge — Act not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-916/16: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2018 — Winkler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Measure not open to challenge — Act not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-916/16: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2018 — Winkler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Measure not open to challenge — Act not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)
IO C 221, 25.6.2018, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 23/04/2018
- Date lodged:
- 28/12/2016
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Gearmáinis
- Type of procedure:
- Cásanna foirne - gan bhunús, Cásanna foirne - neamh-inghlactha
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62016TO0916
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
Case T-916/16: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2018 — Winkler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Measure not open to challenge — Act not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)
Order of the General Court of 23 April 2018 — Winkler v Commission
(Case T-916/16) ( 1 )
‛(Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Measure not open to challenge — Act not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)’
2018/C 221/30Language of the case: GermanParties
Applicant: Bernd Winkler (Grange, Ireland) (represented by: A. Kässens, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)
Re:
ACTION based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the Commission note of 20 April 2016 on a proposal concerning the additional pensionable years to be taken into consideration in the European Union pension scheme, following a request for transfer of pension rights acquired by the applicant before entering the service of the Union and, secondly, to obtain compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the unlawful acts allegedly committed by the Commission when processing that request for transfer.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Bernd Winkler is ordered to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.
