Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TB0217

    Case T-217/16: Order of the General Court of 25 January 2017 — Internacional de Productos Metálicos v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China or consigned from Malaysia — Regulation repealing definitive anti-dumping duties — Act not of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Manifest inadmissibility)

    IO C 78, 13.3.2017, p. 32–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.3.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 78/32


    Order of the General Court of 25 January 2017 — Internacional de Productos Metálicos v Commission

    (Case T-217/16) (1)

    ((Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China or consigned from Malaysia - Regulation repealing definitive anti-dumping duties - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Manifest inadmissibility))

    (2017/C 078/44)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Internacional de Productos Metálicos, SA (Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain) (represented by: C. Cañizares Pacheco, E. Tejedor de la Fuente and A. Monreal Lasheras, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. França and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Article 2 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/278 of 26 February 2016 repealing the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (OJ 2016, L 52, p. 24).

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

    2.

    Internacional de Productos Metálicos, SA is ordered to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.


    Top