This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0801
Case T-801/16 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2018 — Fedtke v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Retirement — Retirement age — Request to extend the period of employment — First and second paragraphs of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service — Purely confirmatory measure — New and substantial facts — Admissibility)
Case T-801/16 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2018 — Fedtke v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Retirement — Retirement age — Request to extend the period of employment — First and second paragraphs of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service — Purely confirmatory measure — New and substantial facts — Admissibility)
Case T-801/16 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2018 — Fedtke v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Retirement — Retirement age — Request to extend the period of employment — First and second paragraphs of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service — Purely confirmatory measure — New and substantial facts — Admissibility)
IO C 240, 9.7.2018, p. 37–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 29/05/2018
- Date lodged:
- 17/11/2016
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Fraincis
- Type of procedure:
- Cásanna foirne - gan bhunús, Breithiúnas a tugadh tar éis an cás a tharchur ar ais - gan bhunús
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62016TJ0801
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
Case T-801/16 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2018 — Fedtke v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Retirement — Retirement age — Request to extend the period of employment — First and second paragraphs of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service — Purely confirmatory measure — New and substantial facts — Admissibility)
Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2018 — Fedtke v EESC
(Case T-801/16 RENV) ( 1 )
‛(Civil service — Officials — Retirement — Retirement age — Request to extend the period of employment — First and second paragraphs of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service — Purely confirmatory measure — New and substantial facts — Admissibility)’
2018/C 240/39Language of the case: FrenchParties
Applicant: Ingrid Fedtke (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, A. Carvajal and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the EESC decision rejecting the applicant’s application to have her period of employment extended until the age of 66.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Ms Ingrid Fedtke to pay the costs incurred in the present proceedings before both the General Court of the European Union and the European Union Civil Service Tribunal. |
( 1 ) OJ C 320, 28.9.2015 (case initially brought before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under case number F-107/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
