This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0583
Case T-583/16: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2017 — PG v Frontex (Civil service — Temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Renewal procedure — Article 266 TFEU — Duty of care — Non-contractual liability)
Case T-583/16: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2017 — PG v Frontex (Civil service — Temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Renewal procedure — Article 266 TFEU — Duty of care — Non-contractual liability)
Case T-583/16: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2017 — PG v Frontex (Civil service — Temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Renewal procedure — Article 266 TFEU — Duty of care — Non-contractual liability)
IO C 221, 10.7.2017, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 17/05/2017
- Date lodged:
- 19/02/2016
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Fraincis
- Type of procedure:
- Caingean chun cúiteamh a ghnóthú - gan bhunús, Cásanna foirne - gan bhunús
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62016TJ0583
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
10.7.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 221/25 |
Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2017 — PG v Frontex
(Case T-583/16)
((Civil service - Temporary staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Renewal procedure - Article 266 TFEU - Duty of care - Non-contractual liability))
(2017/C 221/34)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: PG (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) (represented by: H. Caniard and S. Drew, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
ACTION based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 9 June 2015, taken by the authority in Frontex empowered to conclude contracts of employment, not to renew the applicant’s contract and, second, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr PG to pay the costs. |
