Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015CN0218

Case C-218/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Campobasso (Italy) lodged on 11 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Gianpaolo Paoletti and Others

IO C 262, 10.8.2015, p. 5–5 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
11/05/2015
Date lodged:
11/05/2015
Author:
An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
Form:
Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
Authentic language:
Iodáilis
Type of procedure:
Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Case affecting:
  • Submits a preliminary question about 12012M006
  • Submits a preliminary question about 12012P049
Link

10.8.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/5

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Campobasso (Italy) lodged on 11 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Gianpaolo Paoletti and Others

(Case C-218/15)

(2015/C 262/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Campobasso

Party/parties to the main proceedings

Gianpaolo Paoletti, Umberto Castaldi, Domenico Faricelli, Antonio Angelucci, Mauro Angelucci, Antonio D’Ovidio, Camillo Volpe, Alfredo Viali, Giampaolo Canzano, Raffaele Di Giovanni, Antonio Della Valle

Questions referred

1.

Must Article 7 of the ECHR, Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, proclaimed on 7 December 2000 in Nice, and Article 6 [TEU] be interpreted as meaning that Romania’s accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007 had the effect of abolishing the criminal offence provided for in and punishable under Article 12 of Legislative Decree No 286/1998 (consolidated text [on immigration]) relating to the facilitating of the immigration and stay by Romanian nationals in the territory of the Italian State?

2.

Must those provisions be interpreted as precluding a Member State from applying the principle of benign retroactivity (in mitius) in respect of persons who, before 1 January 2007 (or other subsequent date on which the treaty took full effect), the date on which Romania’s accession to the European Union took effect, were responsible for breach of Article 12 of Legislative Decree No 286/1998 (consolidated text on immigration) in that they facilitated the immigration of Romanian nationals, which ceased to be an offence as from 1 January 2007?
Top