EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0312
Case T-312/14: Action brought on 28 April 2014 — Federcoopesca and Others v Commission
Case T-312/14: Action brought on 28 April 2014 — Federcoopesca and Others v Commission
Case T-312/14: Action brought on 28 April 2014 — Federcoopesca and Others v Commission
IO C 194, 24.6.2014, p. 36–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
24.6.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 194/36 |
Action brought on 28 April 2014 — Federcoopesca and Others v Commission
(Case T-312/14)
2014/C 194/47
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicants: Federazione Nazionale delle Cooperative della Pesca (Federcoopesca) (Rome, Italy); Associazione Lega Pesca (Rome); and AGCI AGR IT AL (Rome) (represented by: L. Caroli and S. Ventura, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
annul Commission Decision C(2013) 8635 final of 6 December 2013 introducing an action plan to rectify shortcomings in the Italian fisheries control system (‘the contested decision’) and, specifically, paragraphs 13, 15, 16 and 17 of the action plan appended thereto; |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The contested decision is intended to rectify the shortcomings observed in the Italian authorities’ implementation of the rules of the common fisheries policy (‘CFP’).
The applicants rely on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law: failure to provide a statement of reasons or failure to provide an adequate statement of reasons.
|
2. |
Second plea in law: infringement of the Treaties and of the rules relating to their implementation.
|
3. |
Third plea in law: breach of the principles of non-discrimination, reasonableness and proportionality.
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law: unlawfulness of the serious infringements system and, in particular, infringement of Article 92 of Regulation No 1224/2009 and breach of the principle that penalties should be gradated and proportionate.
|