Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TB0640

    Case T-640/14: Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Beul v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Functioning of financial markets — Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 — Legislative act — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

    IO C 27, 25.1.2016, p. 56–57 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.1.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 27/56


    Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Beul v Parliament and Council

    (Case T-640/14) (1)

    ((Action for annulment - Functioning of financial markets - Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 - Legislative act - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

    (2016/C 027/72)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Carsten René Beul (Neuwied, Germany) (represented initially by K.-G Stümper, then by H.-M. Pott and T. Eckhold, lawyers)

    Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: P. Schonard and D. Warin, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by R. Weimann and N. Rouam, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC (OJ 2014 L 158, p. 77).

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

    2.

    There is no need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene.

    3.

    Mr Carsten René Beul shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

    4.

    The Commission and the Parliament shall bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.


    (1)  OJ C 409, 17.11.2014.


    Top