This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TB0640
Case T-640/14: Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Beul v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Functioning of financial markets — Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 — Legislative act — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Case T-640/14: Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Beul v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Functioning of financial markets — Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 — Legislative act — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Case T-640/14: Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Beul v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Functioning of financial markets — Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 — Legislative act — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
IO C 27, 25.1.2016, p. 56–57
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.1.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 27/56 |
Order of the General Court of 23 November 2015 — Beul v Parliament and Council
(Case T-640/14) (1)
((Action for annulment - Functioning of financial markets - Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 - Legislative act - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))
(2016/C 027/72)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Carsten René Beul (Neuwied, Germany) (represented initially by K.-G Stümper, then by H.-M. Pott and T. Eckhold, lawyers)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: P. Schonard and D. Warin, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by R. Weimann and N. Rouam, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC (OJ 2014 L 158, p. 77).
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
2. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene. |
3. |
Mr Carsten René Beul shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. |
4. |
The Commission and the Parliament shall bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene. |