This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0056
Case T-56/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Evyap v OHIM — Megusta Trading (nuru) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a wiggly line — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks DURU — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-56/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Evyap v OHIM — Megusta Trading (nuru) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a wiggly line — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks DURU — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-56/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Evyap v OHIM — Megusta Trading (nuru) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a wiggly line — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks DURU — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
IO C 221, 6.7.2015, p. 11–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.7.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 221/11 |
Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Evyap v OHIM — Megusta Trading (nuru)
(Case T-56/14) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark representing a wiggly line - Earlier national and international word and figurative marks DURU - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 221/15)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Evyap Sabun Yağ Gliserin Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Megusta Trading GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 November 2013 (Case R 1861/2012-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Evyap Sabun Yağ Gliserin Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. and Megusta Trading GmbH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1) |
Dismisses the action; |
2) |
Orders Evyap Sabun Yağ Gliserin Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. to pay the costs. |