Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013TN0548

    Case T-548/13: Action brought on 15 October 2013 — Aderans v OHIM — Ofer (VITALHAIR)

    IO C 367, 14.12.2013, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    15/10/2013
    Date lodged:
    15/10/2013
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Gearmáinis
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    14.12.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 367/35

    Action brought on 15 October 2013 — Aderans v OHIM — Ofer (VITALHAIR)

    (Case T-548/13)

    2013/C 367/62

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Aderans Company Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gerhard Ofer (Troisdorf, Germany)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 August 2013 in Case R 1467/2012-1;

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘VITALHAIR’ for goods in Classes 3, 21 and 26 — Community trade mark application No 7 254 378

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Gerhard Ofer

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: the Community word mark ‘Haar-Vital’ and the German figurative mark ‘HAARVITAL’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 26 and 44

    Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 42(2) and (3) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

    Top