EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TA0222

Case T-222/13: Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2014 — B&S Europe v Commission (Public service contracts — Call for tenders — Short-term services in the exclusive interest of third countries benefiting from European Union external aid — Rejection of the application — Selection criteria — Contracts divided into tranches — Reference project — Duty to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Legitimate expectations — Principle of impartiality — Audi alteram partem rule)

IO C 395, 10.11.2014, p. 43–44 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

10.11.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/43


Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2014 — B&S Europe v Commission

(Case T-222/13) (1)

((Public service contracts - Call for tenders - Short-term services in the exclusive interest of third countries benefiting from European Union external aid - Rejection of the application - Selection criteria - Contracts divided into tranches - Reference project - Duty to state reasons - Principle of sound administration - Legitimate expectations - Principle of impartiality - Audi alteram partem rule))

(2014/C 395/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Business and Strategies in Europe (B&S Europe) SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Bihain and S. Pâques, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Bordes and R. Tricot, and subsequently by R. Tricot, acting as Agents, assisted by A.-M. Vandromme and J. Stuyck, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision, set out in its letters of 15 February and 2 April 2013, informing the applicant that it had not been included on the list of candidates invited to participate in the restricted call for tenders concerning lot 7 of the multiple framework contract for the provision of short-term services in the exclusive interest of third countries benefiting from European Union external aid (OJ 2012/S 105-174077).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Business and Strategies in Europe (B&S Europe) SA to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 164 of 8.6.2014.


Top