Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TA0214

Case T-214/13: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2015 — Typke v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to competition EPSO/AD/230-231/12 — Implied refusal to grant access — Refusal to grant access — Request for modification of the form of order sought submitted in the reply — Time-limit — Withdrawal of the implied decision — No need to adjudicate — Concept of a document — Extraction and organisation of information contained in electronic databases)

IO C 270, 17.8.2015, pp. 23–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20150731028616872015/C 270/282142013TC27020150817EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20150702232421

Case T-214/13: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2015 — Typke v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to competition EPSO/AD/230-231/12 — Implied refusal to grant access — Refusal to grant access — Request for modification of the form of order sought submitted in the reply — Time-limit — Withdrawal of the implied decision — No need to adjudicate — Concept of a document — Extraction and organisation of information contained in electronic databases)

Top

C2702015EN2310120150702EN0028231242

Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2015 — Typke v Commission

(Case T-214/13) ( 1 )

‛(Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to competition EPSO/AD/230-231/12 — Implied refusal to grant access — Refusal to grant access — Request for modification of the form of order sought submitted in the reply — Time-limit — Withdrawal of the implied decision — No need to adjudicate — Concept of a document — Extraction and organisation of information contained in electronic databases)’

2015/C 270/28Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rainer Typke (Hasbergen, Germany) (represented by: B. Cortese and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of the decision of the Secretariat-General of the Commission of 5 February 2013 refusing the applicant’s initial application for access to documents relating to the preselection tests for the open competition EPSO/AD/230-231/12 (AD 5-AD 7) (Gestdem 2012/3258) and, secondly, of the implied decision of the Secretariat-General of the Commission, deemed to have been taken on 13 March 2013, refusing the applicant’s second application for access to documents relating to those tests (Gestdem 2013/0068).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claim for annulment of the implied decision refusing access in procedure Gestdem 2013/0068;

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.

Orders Mr Rainer Typke to pay the costs.


( 1 ) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

Top