This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0318
Case C-318/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 11 June 2013 — X
Case C-318/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 11 June 2013 — X
Case C-318/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 11 June 2013 — X
IO C 233, 10.8.2013, p. 4–4
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
IO C 233, 10.8.2013, p. 2–2
(HR)
10.8.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 233/4 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 11 June 2013 — X
(Case C-318/13)
2013/C 233/06
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Korkein hallinto-oikeus
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: X
Questions referred
1. |
Is Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7/EEC (1) (Directive on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment of men and women in matters of social security) to be interpreted in such a way that it precludes national legislation on the basis of which the different life expectancies of men and women are used as an actuarial calculation criterion for a statutory social benefit payable due to an accident, when, by using this criterion, the lump sum benefit paid to a man is smaller than that paid to a woman of the same age and in a similar situation in other respects? |
2. |
If the answer to the first question is affirmative, does the case involve a sufficiently serious breach of EU law, this being a condition for Member State liability, particularly when account is taken of the following:
|
(3) OJ L 204, p. 23.