This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011FB0038
Case F-38/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 July 2011 — Alari v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2009 promotion exercise — Transfer from one institution to another during promotion exercise in which the official would have been promoted in his institution of origin — Institution with competence to decide on promotion of the transferred official)
Case F-38/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 July 2011 — Alari v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2009 promotion exercise — Transfer from one institution to another during promotion exercise in which the official would have been promoted in his institution of origin — Institution with competence to decide on promotion of the transferred official)
Case F-38/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 July 2011 — Alari v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2009 promotion exercise — Transfer from one institution to another during promotion exercise in which the official would have been promoted in his institution of origin — Institution with competence to decide on promotion of the transferred official)
IO C 282, 24.9.2011, p. 51–51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
24.9.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 282/51 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 July 2011 — Alari v Parliament
(Case F-38/11) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2009 promotion exercise - Transfer from one institution to another during promotion exercise in which the official would have been promoted in his institution of origin - Institution with competence to decide on promotion of the transferred official)
2011/C 282/95
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Gianluigi Alari (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J. N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves and M. Ecker, agents)
Re:
Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant in the 2009 promotion exercise.
Operative part of the order
The Tribunal:
1. |
dismisses the action as manifestly lacking any foundation in law; |
2. |
orders the European Parliament to pay the applicant’s costs and to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 179 of 18.06.11, p. 22