Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CB0404

    Case C-404/11 P: Order of the Court of 2 February 2012 — Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Competition — Cartel — Sodium chlorate market — Concept of an ‘undertaking’ — Presumption of decisive influence — Scope of that presumption — Factors not capable of rebutting the presumption — Personal fine — Unlimited jurisdiction)

    IO C 133, 5.5.2012, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.5.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 133/11


    Order of the Court of 2 February 2012 — Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission

    (Case C-404/11 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Competition - Cartel - Sodium chlorate market - Concept of an ‘undertaking’ - Presumption of decisive influence - Scope of that presumption - Factors not capable of rebutting the presumption - Personal fine - Unlimited jurisdiction)

    2012/C 133/20

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Appellant: Elf Aquitaine SA (represented by: E. Morgan de Rivery and E. Lagathu, avocats)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 May 2011 in Case T-299/08 Elf Aquitaine v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought by the applicant for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 2626 final of 11 June 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.695 — Sodium chlorate) — Competition — Cartel — Infringement of the principles of conferral and proportionality — Manifestly erroneous interpretation — Infringement of the rights of the defence, of the principles of equality and equality of arms — Duty to state reasons — Illegality of the personal fine

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The appeal is dismissed.

    2.

    Elf Aquitaine SA is ordered to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.


    Top