This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CA0145
Case C-145/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2001/82/EC — Veterinary medicinal products — Decentralised procedure for the grant of marketing authorisation for a veterinary medicinal product in a number of Member States — Generic medicinal products similar to the reference medicinal products already authorised — Refusal to approve request by a Member State — Composition and form of the medicinal product)
Case C-145/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2001/82/EC — Veterinary medicinal products — Decentralised procedure for the grant of marketing authorisation for a veterinary medicinal product in a number of Member States — Generic medicinal products similar to the reference medicinal products already authorised — Refusal to approve request by a Member State — Composition and form of the medicinal product)
Case C-145/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2001/82/EC — Veterinary medicinal products — Decentralised procedure for the grant of marketing authorisation for a veterinary medicinal product in a number of Member States — Generic medicinal products similar to the reference medicinal products already authorised — Refusal to approve request by a Member State — Composition and form of the medicinal product)
IO C 295, 29.9.2012, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 19/07/2012
- Date lodged:
- 25/03/2011
- Author:
- An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Fraincis
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
29.9.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 295/10 |
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — European Commission v French Republic
(Case C-145/11) (1)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/82/EC - Veterinary medicinal products - Decentralised procedure for the grant of marketing authorisation for a veterinary medicinal product in a number of Member States - Generic medicinal products similar to the reference medicinal products already authorised - Refusal to approve request by a Member State - Composition and form of the medicinal product)
2012/C 295/16
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Šimerdová, A. Marghelis and O. Beynet, Agents)
Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, S. Menez and R. Loosli-Surrans, Agents)
Re:
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 32 and 33 of Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 1) — Decentralised procedure for the grant of marketing authorisation in more than one Member State — Generic medicinal products similar to the reference medicinal products already authorised — Member State’s refusal to approve based on scientific grounds related to the composition of the medicinal product and the choice of pharmaceutical form — Principle of mutual recognition
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Declares that, by refusing to approve two requests for marketing authorisation of the medicinal veterinary products CT-Line 15 % Premix and CT-Line 15 % Oral Powder in the context of the decentralised procedure provided for by Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products, as amended by Directive 2004/28/EC of the European Parliament of the Council of 31 March 2004, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 32 and 33 of that directive; |
|
2. |
Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
