This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TB0414
Case T-414/09: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE) (Community trade marks — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-414/09: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE) (Community trade marks — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-414/09: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE) (Community trade marks — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 113, 1.5.2010, p. 46–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
1.5.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 113/46 |
Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE)
(Case T-414/09) (1)
(Community trade marks - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
2010/C 113/75
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: C. Milbradt, subsequently by C. Milbradt and H. Van Volxem, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: JLO Holding Company LLC (Santa Monica, United States) (represented by: A. Klett, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 July 2009 (Case R 609/2008-1) relating to an application for revocation involving Henkel AG & Co. KGaA and JLO Holding Company, LLC.
Operative part of the order
1. |
There is no further need to adjudicate on the action. |
2. |
The parties shall each bear their own costs. |