This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TA0364
Case T-364/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nollie — Earlier national and international word marks NOLI — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
Case T-364/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nollie — Earlier national and international word marks NOLI — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
Case T-364/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark nollie — Earlier national and international word marks NOLI — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the goods — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
IO C 134, 22.5.2010, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 24/03/2010
- Date lodged:
- 29/08/2008
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Béarla
|
22.5.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 134/32 |
Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — 2nine v OHIM — Pacific Sunwear of California (nollie)
(Case T-364/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark nollie - Earlier national and international word marks NOLI - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the goods - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2010/C 134/53
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: 2nine Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Palmer, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (Anaheim, California, United States)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 June 2008 (Case R 1591/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between 2nine Ltd and Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders 2nine Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
