Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CB0020

    Case C-20/08 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2008 — Enercon GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Three-dimensional mark made up of the shape of the product — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1) — Distinctive character of the mark — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

    IO C 69, 21.3.2009, p. 14–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.3.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 69/14


    Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2008 — Enercon GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    (Case C-20/08 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Community trade mark - Three-dimensional mark made up of the shape of the product - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1) - Distinctive character of the mark - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

    (2009/C 69/23)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Appellant: Enercon GmbH (represented by: R. Böhm and U. Sander, Rechtsanwälte)

    Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, agent)

    Re:

    Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 15 November 2007 in Case T-71/06 Enercon GmbH v OHIM, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 November 2005 rejecting the action for annulment of the examiner's decision refusing to register a three-dimensional Community trade mark depicting the outer casing of the nacelle of a wind turbine for goods in Class 7 — Distinctive character of a three-dimensional mark made up of the shape of the product

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The appeal is dismissed.

    2.

    Enercon GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.


    Top