Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 32012H0090

    2012/90/EU: Commission Recommendation of 14 February 2012 on guidelines for the presentation of the information for the identification of lots of forest reproductive material and the information to be provided on the supplier’s label or document

    IO L 43, 16.2.2012, p. 38–42 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Legal status of the document In force

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2012/90/oj

    16.2.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    L 43/38


    COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

    of 14 February 2012

    on guidelines for the presentation of the information for the identification of lots of forest reproductive material and the information to be provided on the supplier’s label or document

    (2012/90/EU)

    THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

    Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 292 thereof,

    Whereas:

    (1)

    Article 13 of Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the marketing of forest reproductive material (1) lays down the information to be used in order to identify each lot of forest reproductive material (hereinafter ‘FRM’). Furthermore Article 14 of that Directive lays down the information to be indicated in the supplier’s label or document. However no rules have been established concerning the presentation of this information.

    (2)

    Therefore, the way the information is presented in the supplier’s label or document varies significantly across the Union. Several Member States and stakeholders have reported that, due to the use of different languages and forms of presentation, supplier’s labels or documents are frequently not understood in the same manner by the stakeholders involved in trade between Member States.

    (3)

    However, Directive 1999/105/EC does not contain a legal basis allowing the Commission to set legally binding provisions aimed at harmonising the suppliers’ label or document in order to reduce these difficulties. Therefore, it is appropriate to adopt guidelines recommending a presentation of the information to be provided in the supplier’s label or document which facilitates the understanding of this information in all Member States.

    (4)

    In accordance with Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1598/2002 of 6 September 2002 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 1999/105/EC as regards the provision of mutual administrative assistance by official bodies (2), where FRM moves from one Member State to another, the official body of the Member State in which the supplier is based shall provide information to the official body of the Member State in which the recipient is based. This information shall be provided by means of an ‘Information Document’ in a standardised format as regards the way the information is presented and including, as set out in the Annex to that Regulation, the use of a harmonised code to identify the different items.

    (5)

    Given that no difficulties have been reported concerning the use of this ‘Information Document’ and that some of the information requested by Article 14 of Directive 1999/105/EC to be indicated in the supplier’s label or document is also requested by Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1598/2002 for the ‘Information Document’, it is considered appropriate to recommend the use of a numerical code to identify the different items in the supplier’s label or document similar to the one set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1598/2002.

    (6)

    The sequence and content of the codes set out in these guidelines should however be based on the requirements for the marketing of FRM lots and the content of suppliers’ label or document as provided for in Articles 13 and 14 of Directive 1999/105/EC.

    (7)

    These guidelines should take into account the differences referred to in recital 2, to facilitate trade and exchange of information.

    (8)

    The national measures taken by the Member States pursuant to this Recommendation should moreover be established in a transparent manner and should be proportionate to the objective pursued,

    HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

    1.

    In developing national measures concerning the way the information to be provided by the supplier’s label or document as referred to in Article 14 of Directive 1999/105/EC shall be presented, Member States should take into account the guidelines provided in the Annex to this Recommendation.

    2.

    This Recommendation is addressed to the Member States.

    Done at Brussels, 14 February 2012.

    For the Commission

    John DALLI

    Member of the Commission


    (1)   OJ L 11, 15.1.2000, p. 17.

    (2)   OJ L 240, 7.9.2002, p. 39.


    ANNEX

    A.   General principles for the establishment of national measures

    1.   Transparency

    National measures concerning the presentation of the information to be provided at the supplier’s label or document for the marketing of forest reproductive material (hereinafter ‘FRM’) should be developed in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders and in a transparent manner. Member States should also ensure cooperation with other Member States to contribute to reducing the difficulties encountered by stakeholders as a consequence of the differences of the ways this information is presented.

    2.   Proportionality

    The national measures adopted pursuant to this recommendation should be proportionate to the objective which is pursued, namely the facilitation of the understanding of the information provided in different formats and languages. These measures should avoid any unnecessary burden for forest owners and nurseries.

    The choice of measures should take into account the regional and local constraints and characteristics, such as the shape and size of the supplier’s and user’s enterprises, the marketing access, as well as the local, national, Union and supplier’s management practices. They should be proportionate to the level of trades, depending on regional and national specificities and the particular local needs of FRM. These measures could be adopted as national rules, recommendations or guidelines addressed to the suppliers of FRM.

    B.   Identification codes corresponding to relevant items of supplier’s label or document

    The items to be provided on the supplier’s label or document should be presented as listed in the left column of the below table, following the sequence used in Article 13 and Article 14 of Directive 1999/105/EC. Some additional items, under point C may be added, where appropriate, for traceability and information purposes.

    Harmonised identification numbers should be used and presented through the numbers and codes listed in the right column of the below table, serving as numerical translations of the corresponding text in the left column. As these numbers are meant to facilitate retrieval and recognition of the information, they should be added to this information without dropping the fully written, or abbreviated, words of the left column, which are normally used on the suppliers’ labels or documents.

    The relevant harmonised identification code should be written in bold before each item to be provided on the supplier’s label or document.

     

    Number on the supplier’s label or document

    A.   Requirements as listed in Article 13 of Directive 1999/105/EC

    Master certificate code and number

    3

    Botanical name

    6

    Category

    8a

    ‘source identified’

    8b

    ‘selected’

    8c

    ‘qualified’

    8d

    ‘tested’.

    Purpose

    10a

    ‘multifunctional forestry’

    10b

    ‘other’

    Type of basic material

    9a

    ‘seed source’

    9b

    ‘stand’

    9c

    ‘seed orchard’

    9d

    ‘parents of families’

    9e

    ‘clone’

    9f

    ‘clonal mixture’

    Register reference or identity code for region of provenance

    11

    Region of provenance — for reproductive material of the ‘source-identified’ and ‘selected’ categories or other reproductive material if appropriate

    13

    If appropriate, whether the origin of the material is autochthonous or indigenous, non-autochthonous or non-indigenous, or unknown

    12a

    ‘autochthonous/indigenous’

    12b

    ‘non-autochthonous/non-indigenous’

    12c

    ‘unknown’

    In the case of seed units, the year of ripening

    17

    Age of planting stock of seedlings or cuttings, whether undercuts, transplants or containerised

    16

    Type of planting stock of seedlings or cuttings, whether undercuts, transplants or containerised

    7a

    ‘seeds’

    7b

    ‘parts of plants’

    7c

    ‘planting stock (bare root)’

    7d

    ‘planting stock (containers)’

    Whether it is genetically modified

    18a

    ‘yes’

    18b

    ‘no’

    B.   Requirements as listed in Article 14 of Directive 1999/105/EC

    Master certificate number(s) issued under Article 12 of Directive 1999/105/EC or reference to the other document available according to Article 12(3) of that Directive

    3

    Name of supplier

    4

    Quantity supplied

    15

    In the case of reproductive material of the ‘tested’ category whose basic material is approved under Article 4(5) of Directive 1999/105/EC, the words ‘provisionally approved’

    8x

    Whether the material has been vegetatively propagated

    19a

    ‘yes’

    19b

    ‘no’

    In the case of seed, only for quantities above those referred in Article 14(4) of Directive 1999/105/EC

    Purity: the percentage by weight of pure seed, other seed and inert matter of the product marketed as a seed lot

    22

    The germination percentage of the pure seed, or, where germination percentage is impossible or impractical to assess, the viability percentage assessed by reference to a specified method

    23

    The weight of 1 000 pure seeds

    24

    The number of germinable seeds per kilogram of product marketed as seed, or, where the number of germinable seeds is impossible or impractical to assess, the number of viable seeds per kilogram

    25

    In the case of Populus spp. (part of plants)

    Class of stem cuttings (EC 1/EC 2)

    26

    Class of sets (N1/N2 – S1/S2)

    27

    C.   Possible additional items for traceability and information purposes

    Supplier’s document number

    1

    Internal (supplier’s) number of lot

    1a

    Date of dispatch of FRM

    2

    Full address of supplier

    4

    Name and address of the receiver

    5

    Country of the region of provenance or of the location

    13

    Origin of basic material if non-autochthonous or non-indigenous

    14


    Top