EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 5.7.2023
SWD(2023) 813 final
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
2023 Rule of Law Report
Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Cyprus
Accompanying the document
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
2023 Rule of Law Report
The rule of law situation in the European Union
{COM(2023) 800 final} - {SWD(2023) 801 final} - {SWD(2023) 802 final} - {SWD(2023) 803 final} - {SWD(2023) 804 final} - {SWD(2023) 805 final} - {SWD(2023) 806 final} - {SWD(2023) 807 final} - {SWD(2023) 808 final} - {SWD(2023) 809 final} - {SWD(2023) 810 final} - {SWD(2023) 811 final} - {SWD(2023) 812 final} - {SWD(2023) 814 final} - {SWD(2023) 815 final} - {SWD(2023) 816 final} - {SWD(2023) 817 final} - {SWD(2023) 818 final} - {SWD(2023) 819 final} - {SWD(2023) 820 final} - {SWD(2023) 821 final} - {SWD(2023) 822 final} - {SWD(2023) 823 final} - {SWD(2023) 824 final} - {SWD(2023) 825 final} - {SWD(2023) 826 final} - {SWD(2023) 827 final}
Abstract
The Cypriot justice system has undergone significant reforms, including new courts and levels of jurisdiction. The new system of appointments of judges to the Supreme Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court includes a positive step involving the judiciary, in line with European standards. The composition of the Supreme Council of the Judicature was extended to include non-judicial members, thus enhancing its democratic legitimacy, while it does not yet allow for a broader participation of judges chosen by their peers, in line with European standards. The draft law on reform of the Law Office of the Republic tabled in Parliament does not provide a clearer distinction between its advisory and prosecutorial role. The absence of review of decisions of the Attorney General not to prosecute or to discontinue criminal proceedings raise concerns. The justice system continues to face serious challenges as regards its efficiency. A number of ongoing reforms aim to improve the quality and efficiency of the justice system, including the level of digitalisation, but their implementation is slow. The appointment of new judges and the adoption of new procedural rules are positive developments, while the shortage of support staff remains a challenge. Plans to renovate outdated buildings aim to improve current working conditions.
The Independent Anti-Corruption Authority has started its operations, albeit with limited staff. The implementation of the national anti-corruption strategy is on track. Concerns exist on the limited access to information impacting the effectiveness of audits on the finance of public institutions. Shortcomings exist in terms of the effectiveness of investigations and prosecutions, and results on high-level corruption cases are still missing. The legislative framework on lobbying continues to improve, while the asset declaration system remains incomplete as the relevant legislative act is still pending in Parliament. The implementation of provisions on conflicts of interest for members of Parliament continues, and no further steps were taken concerning similar provisions for the public service. Awareness-raising actions were launched on the protection of whistleblowers. The implementation of ethics provisions for the police and the judiciary continued over the past year, with an overall decrease of open cases. The application of the investor citizenship scheme has stopped in practice.
The regulatory framework relating to transparency of media ownership in the audio-visual media sector was strengthened for broadcast media. There have been no developments regarding the regulation of state advertising. Discussions are underway between the Government and the Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation with a view to modernising the law regulating public service media. Some challenges have been encountered in the implementation of the law on public access to information. A bill on press freedom would, if adopted, introduce provisions relating to electronic media, enshrine a code of practice in law and contain provisions aimed at safeguarding the safety of journalists and other media workers.
The creation of the e-consultation platform aims to increase accessibility and transparency in the law-making process, while further action is required to address persistent shortcomings regarding the effective and timely consultation of stakeholders. Plans aiming at digitalising the law-making process are expected to improve the quality of and access to legislation. The reinforcement of the Ombudsperson regulatory framework resulted in its upgrading to an A-status National Human Rights Institution. Administrative and financial burdens raise concerns regarding the environment for civil society.
Recommendations
Overall, concerning the recommendations in the 2022 Rule of Law Report, Cyprus has made:
·Significant progress on ensuring that the reform on the appointment of the Supreme Constitutional Court and Supreme Court judges takes into account European standards on judicial appointments and the opinion of the Venice Commission.
·Some progress on ensuring that the reform on the composition of the Supreme Council of the Judicature takes into account European standards regarding Councils for the Judiciary and the opinion of the Venice Commission.
·Some progress on continuing to improve the effective investigation and adjudication of high-level corruption cases, including by strengthening the Office of the Attorney General and its budgetary independence.
·No progress on introducing rules on asset disclosure for elected officials to establish regular and comprehensive filing, combined with effective, regular and full verifications.
·Some progress on strengthening the rules and mechanisms to enhance the independent governance of public service media taking into account European standards on public service media.
·Some progress on establishing a framework for the effective and timely consultation of stakeholders in the legislative process.
On this basis, and considering other developments that took place in the period of reference, and in addition to recalling the commitments made under the national Recovery and Resilience Plan relating to certain aspects of the justice system and the anti-corruption framework, it is recommended to Cyprus to:
·Strengthen the independence and the accountability of the Prosecution Service, including by providing for a possibility of review of the decision of the Attorney General not to prosecute or to discontinue proceedings, taking into account European standards on independence and autonomy of the prosecution.
·Introduce rules on asset disclosure for elected officials to establish regular and comprehensive filing, combined with effective, regular and full verifications
·Ensure that the recently established Independent Authority for Anti-Corruption has the financial, human and technical resources to effectively perform its competences.
·Adopt legislation to ensure fair and transparent distribution of advertising expenditure by the state and state-owned companies.
·Advance with the process aimed at strengthening the rules and mechanisms to enhance the independent governance of public service media taking into account European standards on public service media.
·Proceed with the adoption of the framework for the effective and timely consultation of stakeholders in the legislative process and ensure its implementation.
I.Justice System
The organisation of the justice system underwent a significant reform, including the establishment of new courts and levels of jurisdiction
. Since 1 July 2023, the court system is composed of six District Courts, six Assize Courts
, the Administrative Court
, the Administrative Court of International Protection
, the Commercial and the Admiral Court
at first instance. In addition, there are family courts, rent control courts, industrial disputes courts and a military court
. A Court of Appeals has been established to deal with appeals against all judgments issued at first instance
. A third instance of jurisdiction was established, comprising the Supreme Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court
. First and second instance judges are appointed, transferred and promoted by the Supreme Council of Judicature (SCJ)
. Judges at the highest courts are appointed by the President of the Republic. The Prosecution Service is organised under the Attorney General of the Republic, who is appointed by the President of the Republic
. The Attorney General heads also the Law Office of the Republic, which is an independent service
assisting him, not subjected to any ministry. Cyprus participates in the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). The independent national bar association has regulatory and disciplinary competence as regards its members.
Independence
The level of perceived judicial independence in Cyprus continues to be average among both the general public and companies. Overall, 54% of the general population and 44% of companies perceive the level of independence of courts and judges to be ‘fairly or very good’ in 2023
. According to data in the 2023 EU Justice Scoreboard, the perceived judicial independence among the general public has consistently increased in the last years. The perceived judicial independence among the general public has increased in comparison with 2022 (50%), but it is lower than in 2016 (56%). The perceived judicial independence among companies has remained stable with a slight decrease compared to 2021 (45%), and 2016 (50%).
Significant progress has been achieved on the reform of the appointments of the judges of the Supreme Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Cyprus to ‘ensure that the reform on the appointment of the Supreme Constitutional Court and Supreme Court judges takes into account European standards on judicial appointments and the opinion of the Venice Commission’
. New legislation was adopted in August 2022 and entered into force on 1 July 2023
. It maintains the power of the President of the Republic to appoint the judges of the two courts in question
, while establishing a new body, the Advisory Judicial Council, to advise the President on the selection, namely by preparing a non-binding list of the most suitable candidates in alphabetical order. The Advisory Judicial Council is composed of the judges of the court for which the candidates apply
, the Attorney General, the President of the Bar association and two experienced lawyers. Only the judges-members have the right to vote. The President of the Republic is not bound to appoint a person from the list of the proposed candidates
. In so far as the President will follow the proposed list in practice, the revised system appears to be in line with the European standards according to which, where the constitutional or legal provisions prescribe that political organs take decisions concerning the selection and career of judges, an independent and competent authority drawn in substantial part from the judiciary should be authorised to make recommendations or express opinions, which the relevant appointing authority follows in practice
. In its opinion on the envisaged reform, the Venice Commission has made some further recommendations and comments in order to further improve the objectivity of the appointment process.
As recommended by the Venice Commission, the law requires the evaluation of candidates to be made following pre-defined criteria
. The Government considers that it is not possible under the Constitution to take other elements suggested by the Venice Commission
. Therefore, there has been significant progress on the implementation of the recommendation made in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
Some progress has been made on the composition of the Supreme Council of the Judicature, while a broader participation of the judges selected by their peers is lacking. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Cyprus to ‘ensure that the reform on the composition of the Supreme Council of the Judicature takes into account European standards regarding Councils for the Judiciary and the opinion of the Venice Commission’
. The reform was adopted in August 2022 and entered into force on 1 July 2023
. It provides for the judicial review of the decisions of the Supreme Council of the Judicature by the Supreme Constitutional Court. Furthermore, it extends the composition of the Supreme Council of the Judicature to include, beside its judicial component consisting of all judges of the Supreme Court, a non-judicial component with the aim to enhance its democratic legitimacy. The Attorney General, the President of the Bar association and two experienced lawyers now participate, without voting rights, in sessions regarding the appointment, promotion and transfer of judges. The Bar association pointed to the positive experience from its President’s first participation to the appointments under the newly established system, a view shared by the Association of judges
. Regarding the judicial component, the new law did not move forward with the initial proposal to have this component consisting of senior members from the various court levels, which had raised concerns as to the selection by seniority instead of by election through peers
. The Government has indicated that the Constitution requires the Supreme Court to be the Supreme Council of the Judicature. Hence, the judges participating in the Supreme Council of the Judicature remain all the judges of the Supreme Court. The Council of Europe Recommendation, aiming to safeguard the pluralism inside the judiciary, calls for judges-members of judicial councils to be chosen by their peers from all levels of the judiciary
. As the new composition of the Supreme Council of the Judicature enhances its democratic legitimacy, while not yet allowing for a broader participation of judges chosen by their peers, some progress has been made regarding the implementation of the recommendation made in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
The draft law on the reform of the Law Office, which has been tabled in Parliament, does not provide a clearer distinction between its advisory and prosecutorial role. The Prosecution Service is part of the Law Office of the Republic, headed by the Attorney General. There is no clear separation between staff entrusted with advisory tasks and those carrying out prosecutorial tasks
. In 2016, GRECO expressed the view that being an integrated part of the Law Office, the prosecution service may be seen to operate in an environment that is not fully free from potential or real risk of improper influence
. Following approval by the Government in February 2023, a draft law was submitted to the relevant parliamentary committee in April 2023 for discussion
.The proposed law focuses on two main points: (i) the salary alignment of law officers with the salary scales of judicial officers
and (ii) the establishment of a prosecutorial council to decide on recruitment, promotions, dismissals, and disciplinary action against law officers
. The draft law also includes the creation of the position of General Director of the Law Office, who will act as controlling officer for financial control purposes
. According to the Law Office, there are no plans to make a clearer distinction between the prosecution and the advisory role of the Office, as the need for such reform has not been either expressly pointed out nor implied by GRECO
. The Bar association expressed the view that the establishment of an independent Director of the Public Prosecution Service is desirable
. Stakeholders also referred with scepticism to the dual role of the Law Office and referred to public commitments made by the President of the Republic to reflect on the separation of the advisory role and the prosecutorial function
.
The absence of a possibility of review of the decision of the Attorney General not to prosecute or to discontinue proceedings raises concerns. According to data in the 2022 EU Justice Scoreboard, Cyprus is the only Member State where no form of review of such decisions, neither judicial nor hierarchical, is provided
. The Constitution provides that the Attorney General has the power, exercisable at his or her discretion in the public interest, to institute, conduct, take over and continue or discontinue any criminal proceedings
. The Rules on Criminal Procedure further provide that the Attorney General may register a stay of prosecution at any stage prior to the delivery of a judgment, resulting in the termination of the proceedings
. According to the Supreme Court, the decisions of the Attorney General cannot be reviewed and do not need to be reasoned
. The Government considers that the exclusive power of the Attorney General to initiate, conduct, or discontinue criminal proceedings is balanced by the latter’s practice to provide reasons for his decisions, unless he is prevented from doing so for reasons of public interest or the protection of other persons’ rights. According to European standards, the absence of remedies against decisions of public prosecutors not to prosecute results in a high risk of non-accountability
. Stakeholders also emphasised the need to establish adequate checks and balances against unlimited prosecutorial discretion
.
Quality
Ongoing projects aim to improve the quality of justice, including the level of digitalisation, while the implementation rate has been slow, and shortcomings remain. The establishment of an Independent Court Service responsible for the management and administration of the courts is an ambitious reform project that is expected to alleviate the burden on the Supreme Court and serve the functioning of courts, thus contributing to an efficient delivery of justice. A study, including recommendations as to the structure of the Court Service, its procedures and staffing requirements, has been successfully completed
. However, its implementation is under discussion between the relevant services and interested parties and is estimated to take up to three years
. The level of digitalisation remains low, as reflected in the 2023 EU Justice Scoreboard. Despite some progress in the adoption of procedural rules allowing the use of digital technology in proceedings
and the availability of secure electronic communication for prosecution services
, challenges remain, in particular regarding digital solutions to initiate and follow proceedings
and the availability of digital tools and adequate infrastructure at the disposal of judges, prosecutors and judicial staff
. Ongoing projects plan to improve the use of digital technology, but they have so far not been completed. The target for completing the development and installation of the e-justice system by the end of 2022
has been further. The introduction of Digital Audio Recording in court proceedings aims to gradually replace the stenography used today. The project is also included in the National Resilience and Recovery Plan and is scheduled to be completed in March 2025
.
Plans to renovate outdated buildings, including through the National Resilience and Recovery Facility, aim to improve current working conditions. The extension of the Famagusta District Court, a milestone achieved under the National Resilience and Recovery Plan, is a positive step in addressing inefficiencies caused by inadequate court premises
. The poor condition of the court buildings in Nicosia results in difficult working conditions for the judges and court staff
. While there are ongoing plans to renovate the buildings, future works are not expected to be finalised before 2025
. The lack of a comprehensive computerised registration system and adequate storage areas have led to documents being lost, contributing to delays in the administration of justice. The need to strengthen the security of the courts to protect its personnel and property has also been underlined
.
The recruitment of new judges is a positive step, while the shortage of support staff remains a challenge. The establishment of new courts, following the entry into force of the reform of the courts system, and the implementation of measures to reduce the backlog require the creation of new posts for judges
. 41 judges have been appointed by February 2023
, including, for the first time, experienced lawyers in senior judicial positions, a development welcomed by the Bar Association
. The process for appointing 49 additional judges is ongoing and seeks to increase the general capacity of the judicial system. Nevertheless, the lack of support staff, including stenographers, secretaries and clerks, remains a challenge causing significant delays in the adjudication of cases, as underlined by judges, court staff and lawyers
.
Trainings offered by the Judicial Training School and the establishment of the Academy of the Law Office aim to increase the quality of the justice. The Judicial Training School offers introductory and continuing training to judges, registrars, and legal officers, including training abroad through different networks
. It includes courses on different areas of law, judicial ethics, as well as on specific skills, such as judgment drafting, case management and digital skills
. The trainers are mostly judges
. The training on the new Civil Procedure Rules, is considered a priority
and is advancing as planned
. Ιn late 2022, the Law Office established the Academy of the Law Office to provide in-house training to its staff members
.
Draft legislation on the granting of legal aid aims to make the procedure more efficient. Legal aid can be granted in the majority of court proceedings, with the exception of civil proceedings
and covers all costs. The person entitled to legal aid chooses a lawyer from the lists of lawyers who offer their services
. In September 2022, the Ministry of Justice put forward a proposal to reform the procedure, including the rotating appointment of lawyers based on a list in alphabetical order
. In March 2023, the competent Parliamentary Committee discussed the draft legislation. Objections were raised, mainly by the Bar Association
, as to the constitutionality of the proposed rotation system. The Ministry of Justice will now further discuss the draft law with the Law Office.
Efficiency
Serious challenges remain regarding the efficiency of justice, in particular the excessive length of proceedings. The disposition time in civil and commercial cases at first instance courts slightly decreased but remains the highest in the EU, as it reached 947 days in 2021
. For administrative cases, the disposition time in 2021 remained at the same high level of 844 days (863 days in 2020)
. Furthermore, the disposition time at second instance courts has reached the worrying level of 3 132 days in 2021 (2 688 in 2020)
. In 2021, the clearance rate for litigious civil and commercial cases decreased to 81.3% (from 88.3%)
. The clearance rate in 2021 for administrative cases was exceptionally low, 45.9%, the lowest in the EU
. Stakeholders have highlighted the problems caused by the significant delays in the administration of justice and identified the length of proceedings as the most important challenge for the judicial system
. Concrete targets to reduce the backlog of cases are included in the National Resilience and Recovery Plan and require that specific proportions of backlog cases be cleared within specific timeframes
. According to the manager for backlog cases
, as a result of the different measures and practices applied, a reduction of the backlog cases is already observed since February 2023
.
Special Procedural Rules on Delayed Cases aim to allow courts to deal more efficiently with backlog cases. Further to the new Rules on Civil Procedure, which will enter into force in September 2023
, the Supreme Court issued the 2022 Special Procedural Rules on Delayed Cases, in November 2022
. The Rules apply to pending cases lodged between 2014 and 2018 without a hearing on the merits. They provide judges with greater case management powers, including the possibility to adjudicate solely based on written evidence and limit the right to appeal against interim orders. In December 2022, the Rules were amended following strong reactions from the Bar association. The main issue of disagreement was the limitation on the number of witnesses to be heard, which is henceforth determined by the judges after consulting the lawyers
.
The establishment of new courts is expected to balance the distribution of cases and contribute to improve efficiency. The Court of Appeal is expected to hear 3 149 cases of which the vast majority (2 158) are civil appeals pending before the Supreme Court since 1 January 2018
. The two Courts of special jurisdiction, the Commercial Court
and the Admiralty Court
, are expected to contribute to decongest the heavily burdened district courts. The Commercial Court will adopt a fast-track procedure to deal with cases in a timeframe ranging from 9 months to a year. Both courts may conduct proceedings in English at the request of the parties, with a view to making justice more attractive, taking into account the diverse Cypriot community and the large number of ships registered in Cyprus
.
II.Anti-Corruption Framework
The Independent Anti-Corruption Authority (IACA) is responsible for transparency and prevention of corruption in both the public and private sectors, including monitoring the implementation of the national anti-corruption plan. The implementation of the Action Plan against Corruption (2021-2026) expected to be transferred to the IACA from the Office of Transparency and Prevention of Corruption of the Ministry of Justice to the IACA in the second half of 2023. The Attorney General maintains overall competence to prosecute criminal offences, including corruption, and continues to provide legal advice to law enforcement authorities investigating corruption offences. The Audit General office checks the expenses of public institutions, through which it may detect suspicious of corruption. Cyprus is not a signatory party to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention
.
The perception among experts and business executives is that the level of corruption in the public sector remains relatively high
. In the 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index by Transparency International, Cyprus scores 52/100 and ranks 21st in the European Union and 51st globally. This perception has significantly deteriorated
over the past five years. The 2023 Special Eurobarometer on Corruption shows that 92% of respondents consider corruption widespread in their country (EU average 70%) and 58% of respondents feel personally affected by corruption in their daily lives (EU average 24%). As regards businesses, 95% of companies consider that corruption is widespread (EU average 65%) and 72% consider that corruption is a problem when doing business (EU average 35%). Furthermore, 19% of respondents find that there are enough successful prosecutions to deter people from corrupt practices (EU average 32%)
, while 12% of companies believe that people and businesses caught for bribing a senior official are appropriately punished (EU average 30%)
.
The Independent Anti-Corruption Authority started its operations, albeit with limited staff resources. The Independent Anti-Corruption Authority (IACA) was established in February 2022 and started its activity in December 2022
. It is responsible for transparency and prevention of corruption in both the public and private sectors, including monitoring the implementation of the national anti-corruption plan
. The IACA has no investigative or sanctioning powers
. In addition to the Chief Commissioner and four members of the board, currently IACA has just one temporary legal officer (seconded until 2024), plus five clerical staff (including two junior servants with a four-month contract), with an annual budget of EUR 1 million
. The hiring of permanent staff is delayed because the specific regulation on personnel has not been adopted yet
. The IACA is concerned about the fact that the selection of staff must be done centrally (by the public sector commission), and not directly by the IACA
. The inadequate size, specialisation and permanence of the personnel currently available are concerning given the scope of its tasks
. Since it was established in 2022, the IACA has received more than 50 complaints, (including some related to high-level officials, such as Ministers, or representatives of local authorities
). However, no cases have been forwarded to the Attorney General’s office so far
.
The implementation of the national anti-corruption strategy is on track. In accordance with the law establishing the IACA
, the monitoring on the implementation of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy will pass from the Ministry of Justice Office on Transparency to the IACA in the second half of 2023
. In 2022, the Ministry of Justice organised several activities to implement the national anti-corruption strategy: a) four workshops on the prevention of corruption in the public sector took place, with participation of civil servants and teachers; b) a seminar for public officials involved in the implementation of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy
, as well as c) a mock competition for students on the fight against corruption
. In 2022, a rotation programme of public servants, aimed at preventing corruptive activities, took place
. At the end of July 2022, the Council of Ministers adopted guidelines to avoid conflicts of interests in projects funded through the National RRP
.
Concerns exist related to limited access to information that impacts the effectiveness of the audits performed by the Audit Office on the finance of public institutions. By law, the Audit Office
is empowered to have unrestricted access to information deemed relevant to the audits of public entities
. However, the Auditor General reported that, after seeking the legal advice of the Attorney General, public institutions under audit do not disclose information requested by the Audit Office
. The Auditor General office raised concerns on the fact that limited access to information impairs the effectiveness of the audits and the fight against corruption
. In its controls, the Audit Office encountered some deficiencies that may lead to corruption, especially related to awarding large public contracts without a public tender
. The Flash Eurobarometer on Businesses’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU shows that 65% of companies in Cyprus (EU average 26%) think that corruption has prevented them from winning a public tender or a public procurement contract in practice in the last three years
. Since July 2022, the Audit office sent seven cases of possible corruption to the IACA
. In 2022, the Audit Office issued guidance to facilitate audits
.
Shortcomings have been identified in terms of the effectiveness of investigations and prosecutions, and results on high-level corruption cases are still missing. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Cyprus to “continue to improve the effective investigation and adjudication of high-level corruption cases, including by strengthening the Office of the Attorney General and its budgetary independence”
. In 2022, 14 lawyers were hired, while 10 prosecutors and 24 lawyers are expected to join in the second half of 2023
. Currently, the Attorney General office has put in place a management system mechanism for tracking the operations related to prosecutions, including on corruption
. The Anti-Corruption Taskforce, which was created at the beginning of 2022 under the competence of the Attorney General office, convenes at regular intervals, as well as on ad hoc basis if needed
. The Financial Crime Investigation Office of the Police continues to rely on 23 specialised officers
, and there is a need for reinforcement
. In 2022, 19 investigations for corruption were initiated: 6 cases were brought to trial (this included one conviction, while 5 cases remained pending trial); 1 case was closed, and 12 cases remain pending for further investigation
.Despite these efforts, the limited human, financial and technical resources available continue to affect the investigations, and the results on the adjudication of high-level cases of corruption are still missing. So far, there has been some progress on the implementation of the recommendation made in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
The asset declaration system remains incomplete as the approval of a relevant act remains pending since 2021. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Cyprus to “introduce rules on asset disclosure for elected officials to establish regular and comprehensive filing, combined with effective, regular and full verifications”
. With regard to asset declaration, some high-ranking officials
and a few elected officials, (such as members of Parliament and the President of the Republic)
, are bound to declare part of their assets
. However, data on the implementation of the asset disclosure mechanism, including possible sanctions, is still lacking. The draft bill on asset declarations for all elected and other civil servants that was tabled with the Parliamentary Committee in 2021 remains pending
, and the concerns set out in the previous Rule of Law reports remain unaddressed
. Therefore, there has been no progress on the implementation of the recommendation made in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
The legislative framework on lobbying continues to improve, the conflicts of interest for members of Parliament are monitored by a parliamentary committee, while no further steps were taken towards a comprehensive legislation on conflicts of interest for the public service. In January 2023, the remaining sections 6 and 7 (on the sanctions and penalties, respectively) of the Law on the transparency of lobbying
, entered into force. The implementing regulation on lobbying, which clarifies the procedure for declaring, recording, and publishing lobbying activities, was adopted in April 2023
. The IACA has prepared a declaration form and a code of ethics for lobbyists
. A Parliamentary Committee continues to monitor the compliance of members of Parliament with their Code of Conduct
. In 2022, there were three cases on conflicts of interest (compared to 21 in 2021), with one oral reprimand issued
. Some rules on conflicts of interest in the public service exist in different laws, however no further steps were taken towards a comprehensive regulation on conflict of interest for all State officials
.
An awareness-raising action plan on the protection of whistleblowers was launched. In 2022, an awareness raising action plan was launched, including training for public officers and the online publication of guidelines on the whistleblowing procedure
. A list of authorities competent to support potential whistleblowers was drafted by the Ministry of Justice, and it is expected to be published online
. Since the entry into force of the law on the protection of whistleblowers in February 2022, there have been no whistleblowing reports received by the police and the IACA
.
The implementation of ethics provisions for the police and the judiciary continued over the past year, with an overall decrease of cases opened against police officers. In 2022, the Police Internal Affairs Service (PIAS) was contacted 95 times with information (compared to 101 times in 2021) about possible involvement of police officers in acts of corruption. Nineteen cases were investigated: two cases were transferred to the prosecution authorities (and brought to trial), while 10 cases were closed (for lack of evidence) and seven cases remain pending for further investigation
. In the same year, the Investigation of Allegations and Complaints against the Police (IAIACAP) opened 71 disciplinary procedures (compared to 83 in 2021), which resulted in 11 decisions (compared to 46 in 2021) with sanctions (either a reprimand or a fine) issued by the Chief of Police, while 53 remain pending for decision, 4 disciplinary proceedings were suspended and in 3 cases no disciplinary action was taken
. Newly recruited judges must attend a training on judicial ethics delivered by the judicial training school
.
Cyprus has stopped applying its investor citizenship scheme in practice. The European Commission has frequently raised its serious concerns about the incompatibility with EU law of investor citizenship schemes in light of EU citizenship and the principle of sincere cooperation. Such schemes also present inherent risks of corruption
. The infringement procedure launched in October 2020 concerning Cyprus’ scheme is ongoing
. A total of 26 Cypriot law firms were audited by the Cyprus Bar Association in connection with the investor citizenship scheme, with five found guilty and fined for EUR 200 000
. Cyprus has stopped applying its investor citizenship scheme in practice, although the scheme’s legal framework remains in force.
III.Media Pluralism and Media Freedom
In Cyprus, freedom of expression and the right of access to information find legal and formal protection in the Constitution. Legislation expressly ensures protection of journalistic sources, fosters media pluralism in the radio and television sector, enshrines the formal independence of the media regulator and details the right of access to public sector information. The Law on the Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation (CyBC) lays down rules on the governance and financing of public service television and radio
.
Cyprus’s media regulator, which is an independent Authority, is governed primarily, by the Radio and Television Organisations Law as well as the Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation Law. The legislation was amended in 2021 and expressly stipulates that the Cyprus Radio Television Authority (CRTA), the regulator for audio-visual media services, shall be functionally and effectively independent
. The Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM) maintains its overall low risk score for the independence of the media regulator although it points out, once more, that selection criteria for appointment of members by the Government remain very generic. On the other hand, the MPM points out that the authority will henceforth submit annual activity reports to the President of the Parliament based on an obligation set out in the above-mentioned law, thereby enhancing transparency overall
.
The regulatory framework relating to transparency of media ownership in the audio-visual media sector was strengthened for broadcast media. As referred in the 2022 Rule of Law Report, the 2021 amendments to the Radio and Television Organisations Law addressed previously identified gaps by obliging all media service providers under Cypriot jurisdiction to make accessible to the CRTA information concerning their ownership structure, including the beneficial owners
. At present, the MPM once more classifies this as an area of high risk due to the total absence of regulation for digital media, the inexistence of ownership transparency obligations for print media and inefficiency in ensuring respect of ownership information transparency under the Radio and Television Organisations Law
. In Cyprus, the media regulatory authority has no power of review of media mergers and acquisitions. The competent Minister may, prior to the decision of the Competition authority, declare that a notified concentration shall be deemed to be of major public interest as regards the effect it may have on the public security, the pluralism of the media or the principles of sound administration
.
The lack of legislation and transparency in the field of state advertising remain issues of concern. While a set of guidelines regulating advertising campaigns performed by the Government’s press and information office were previously adopted by the Ministry of Interior
, the MPM reports that, it has been unable to obtain data and information on the allocation of state resources to the media for the reporting period from the competent authorities
. Stakeholders consider that the area lacks any real transparency which, when coupled with other factors such as serious economic difficulties besetting the media sector
, could have negative impact on editorial freedom and independence in Cyprus
. For these reasons, the Monitor has considerably raised its risk level for this area from low risk to just one percentage point below high risk
.
Some progress has been made with regard to the independent governance of public service media. The 2022 Rule of Law report recommended to Cyprus to “strengthen the rules and mechanisms to enhance the independent governance of public service media taking into account European standards on public service media”
. Discussions are underway between the Government and the CyBC aimed at a modernisation of the Law on the Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation, by modifying the system of appointment and dismissal of members of CyBC’s Board and establishing stricter eligibility conditions
. Appointments would only be possible following an open call for applications and any dismissal of a board member would need to be duly justified. While awaiting progress in this area, the Media Pluralism Monitor highlights that the current situation permits state and political party influence on CyBC’s operations, thereby maintaining its high-risk score for this area
. While the concerns raised in the 2022 rule of law report
and by MPM persist, the above-mentioned discussions represent some progress with regard to the 2022 Recommendation on enhancement of the independent governance of public service media
.
Challenges persist with regard to requests for access to information
. According to the Commissioner for Information, these difficulties are primarily due to the competent services facing difficulties when processing requests for access within the statutory 30-day deadline
. The authorities also face difficulties in interpreting and applying the legal exceptions to access, given that the Law establishing the right of access was adopted in 2017 but only came into force in December 2020
. Irrespective of this, the Commissioner assesses the administration’s general level of compliance with her opinions and recommendations as satisfactory
. While positive developments were expected following the coming into force of the Law on Access to Public Sector Information, MPM concludes that the resulting “publication schemes” - adopted by the various authorities indicating how they intend to implement the law in effect - leave considerable room for arbitrariness. As a result, MPM has significantly increased its risk level for this area which it now considers high-risk
.
A bill aimed at providing a legal framework for press freedom remains under discussion
. The draft Law on the Safeguarding of Freedom of the Press and the Operation of the Media, if adopted, would introduce provisions relating to electronic media, enshrine a code of practice in law and contain provisions to safeguard the safety of journalists and other media workers. The Council of Europe’s Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists has published no new alerts since the publication of the 2022 Rule of Law Report, relating to the Republic of Cyprus
. The MPM points out that journalists continue to face numerous challenges due to economic pressures impacting the sector with many layoffs registered in 2022
.
IV.Other Institutional Issues related to Checks and Balances
The Republic of Cyprus is a presidential representative republic. The President of Cyprus is both Head of State and Head of Government. The House of Representatives is the Parliament, which is vested with legislative power. Both representatives and ministers have the right of legislative initiative. The Supreme Constitutional Court is competent to assess the constitutionality of laws in the context of specific cases brought before it
. There are a number of national independent authorities, organisations and institutions that aim to protect and safeguard human rights.
Some progress has been achieved regarding the 2022 recommendation on public consultations following the creation of the e-consultation platform, while further action is required to finalise the reform and address persistent shortcomings. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Cyprus to ‘establish a framework for the effective and timely consultation of stakeholders in the legislative process’
. The e-consultation platform, an electronic platform for public consultations, is expected to become operational in September 2023. The platform shall replace the previous practice where public consultations were dispersed across the websites of different ministries, however the relevant decision has not been adopted yet
. The platform, which is announced to progressively include strategies and other initiatives in addition to draft legislation
, will be a positive step towards increasing accessibility and transparency of the legislative process. An amended Consultation Guide, addressed to public servants involved in the process of law-making is in the final stage of being adopted. The amended draft Guide maintains all the guidelines from the previous Guide, adopted in 2016, and adds new guidance on the use of the platform, which becomes the main tool for publication and communication
. While the guidance is comprehensive, it has so far not proven to be sufficient to allow for a systematic and timely consultation of stakeholders
. Public consultations are still not compulsory
and the competent service maintains its discretion to decide whether to proceed with a public consultation or to opt for a targeted consultation, thus only engaging with specific groups, as the draft Guide does not include criteria in this respect. The planned reform of the legislative process and the implementation of the e-legislation project is expected to address this concern in the near future, as public consultation should become a required step
. Stakeholders have also highlighted the need to be involved at an earlier stage before a draft law is discussed in Parliament
. The planned development of the electronic platform of the NGO Registry to include targeted alerts on forthcoming consultations may be of help, but its implementation requires time
. In addition, challenges remain regarding the absence of any obligation for the competent services to provide feedback to participants on how their input has helped shape regulatory proposals
. Against this background, some progress was achieved on the implementation of the recommendation made in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
Plans aiming at digitalising the law-making process are expected to improve the quality of and access to legislation. OECD indicators on regulatory governance and policy are well below the EU average, including in relation to conducting regulatory impact assessments
. The quality of law-making and frequent changes in legislation remain a reason for concern about the effectiveness of investment protection among companies in Cyprus (36%, same percentage as in 2022)
. Under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, Cyprus is undertaking a major reform of its legislative process
. This includes digitalisation and the creation of a legislation preparation platform (e-legislation platform), enabling easier drafting, consolidation, management and storing of laws and regulations accessible to citizens and businesses. The public procurement and the award of the contract for the development of the platform are scheduled to be completed by the end of 2023
.
The reinforcement of the regulatory framework has strengthened the Ombudsperson as a National Human Rights Institution and resulted in its upgrading to an A-status National Human Rights Institution. The implementation of a number of recommendations addressed by the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) aiming to strengthen the office of the Ombudsperson, resulted in an upgrading to A-status, in October 2022
. In particular, the Ombudsperson established a Human Rights Advisory Committee, comprising various human rights stakeholders, including representatives of civil society
. The procedure for the appointment of the Ombudsperson was formalised
, while re-appointment has been limited to one additional term
. The Ombudsperson manages its allocated budget, but still considers that its Office needs additional funding to allow recruitment of staff at senior level, given its broad mandate
. According to the Ombudsperson, compliance with its recommendations has increased in recent years
. However, while public authorities fully comply with its decisions issued under its mandate as Equality Body, they appear to be less responsive when systemic problems are involved
.
On 1 January 2023, Cyprus had 9 leading judgments of the European Court of Human Rights pending implementation, a decrease of one compared to the previous year
. At that time, Cyprus’ rate of leading judgments from the past 10 years that remained pending was at 59% (compared to 71% in 2022) and the average time that the judgments had been pending implementation was 3 year and 3 months (compared to 2 years and 7 months in 2022)
. The oldest leading judgment, pending implementation for 9 years, concerns the lack of a remedy with automatic suspensive effect in deportation proceedings and the absence of timely review of the lawfulness of detention
. On 15 June 2023, the number of leading judgments pending implementation remains nine
.
Administrative and financial burdens raise concerns regarding the environment for civil society. The civic space has been downgraded from open to narrowed
due to difficulties which civil society organisations (CSOs) are facing to secure funding
and the ongoing legal proceedings instituted by a CSO which was removed from the registry of associations in 2020 and since then is operating under significant restrictions
. The implementation of the Law on Associations and Foundations continues to raise concerns, in particular as regards the registration of CSOs
. CSOs criticise the lack of clear guidance
, the frequent changes in the practices followed, the different standards applied in the different districts
, the long delays and the lack of sufficient human resources dealing with the processing of registration files
. As a result, the non-registered CSOs were not eligible to respond to calls for participation in advisory and coordination groups set by the Ministry of Interior
. Furthermore, following up on deficiencies identified by the Council of Europe during Cyprus’ evaluation on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures, the Ministry of Interior carried out a risk assessment of non-profit organisations with the view to identify those at high-risk
. The administrative requirements of this monitoring exercise, which lasted from May 2022 to February 2023, did not always find a right balance between targeted protection from money laundering abuse and proportionality of the measures and had unintended consequences
. In particular, banks tend to consider all non-profit entities as high risk, with the result for CSOs to face additional administrative and financial burdens, including the freezing of their assets
. According to the Government, the conclusion of the risk assessment exercise has raised banks’ confidence in CSOs provided with certificates by the authorities, as they have been assessed and are continuously monitored
. The creation of the NGO platform aims to reduce the administrative burden, improve communication and the quality of services provided to CSOs. In addition to its function as an electronic registry, the NGO platform will also allow virtual interaction between the CSOs and the authorities, including electronic submission of documents and applications, interaction between the CSOs and access to public consultations
. While initially scheduled to become fully operational in August 2022
, its implementation has been further delayed
. In January 2023, the Citizens Commissioner presented a strategy aiming to promote active civic participation and create a favourable and enabling environment for CSOs. This strategy includes plans to adopt legislation on the Citizens’ Initiative, which aims to allow citizens to submit requests to the Government to take action in specific areas of competence, thus empowering their effective participation in the decision-making process
. A similar legislative proposal is, however, already pending before Parliament since 2017
.
Annex I: List of sources in alphabetical order*
* The list of contributions received in the context of the consultation for the 2023 Rule of Law report can be found at
https://commission.europa.eu/publications/2023-rule-law-report-targeted-stakeholder-consultation_en
.
Audit Office (2022), Annual Report 2021.
Audit Office (2022), Statement on the Cyprus Investor Citizenship Scheme, 19 October 2022.
Audit Office (2023), Statement on the Refusal of the Ministry of Defence to provide information, 29 April 2023.
Audit Office (2023), Written contribution from the Audit Office in the context of the country visit.
Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era in the year 2022 (2023) Country report: Cyprus.
Centre for the Rule of Law and European Values (CroLev) (2023), Contribution from CroLev for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Centre for the Rule of Law and European Values (CroLev) (2023), Written contribution from CroLev in the context of the country visit.
Civicus (2023), Monitor tracking civic space – Cyprus,
https://monitor.civicus.org/country/cyprus/
.
Committee on Media Ethics, Contribution from the Committee on Media Ethics in the context of the country visit.
Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) (2023), Contribution from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Council of Europe: Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (2022), 2nd Enhanced Follow-up Report.
Council of Europe: Committee of Ministers (2000), Recommendation CM/Rec(2000)19 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the role of public prosecution in the criminal justice system.
Council of Europe: Committee of Ministers (2010), Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities.
Council of Europe: Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists.
Council of Europe: Venice Commission (2010), Report on European Standards as regards the independence of the judicial system: Part II- the prosecution service (CDL-AD(2010)040).
Council of Europe: Venice Commission (2016), Rule of Law Checklist (CDL-AD(2016)017).
Council of Europe: Venice Commission (2018), Opinion on Constitutional arrangements and separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary and law enforcement (CDL-AD(2018)028-e).
Council of Europe: Venice Commission (2021), Opinion on three bills reforming the judiciary in Cyprus (CDL-AD(2021)043).
Council of the European Union (2021), Council Implementing Decision of 20 July 2021 on the approval of the assessment of the recovery and resilience plan for Cyprus with Annex.
Cypriot Government (2022), Input from Cyprus for the 2022 Rule of Law.
Cyprus Bar Association (2023), Written contribution from the Cyprus Bar Association in the context of the country visit.
Cyprus Mail (2022), New anti-corruption authority unable to work, 16 November 2022,
https://cyprus-mail.com/2022/11/16/new-anti-corruption-authority-unable-to-work/
.
Cyprus Mail (2023), Droushiotis’ corruption claims will be investigated by foreign experts, January 2023,
https://cyprus-mail.com/2023/01/02/droushiotis-corruption-claims-will-be-investigated-by-foreign-experts/
.
Department of Judicial Reform, Supreme Court, Written contribution from the Cyprus Bar Association in the context of the country visit.
European Civic Forum (2023), Annual Civic Space Report – 2022 Cyprus.
European Commission (2020), 2020 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Cyprus.
European Commission (2021), 2021 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Cyprus.
European Commission (2022), 2022 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Cyprus.
European Commission (2022), EU Justice Scoreboard.
European Commission (2023), EU Justice Scoreboard.
European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 23 July 2013, M.A. v. Cyprus, 41872/10.
European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) (2023), Contribution from the EFJ for the Rule of Law Report.
European Implementation Network (2023), Contribution from the European Implementation Network for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (2023), Cyprus, Office of the Commissioner for Administration and the Protection of Human Rights (2023), Impact of 2022 ENNHRI rule of law reporting.
European Parliament: Flash Eurobarometer: News & Media Survey 2022.
European Public Prosecutor’s Office (2023), Annual report 2022.
EU Contact Committee statement (CC 1/2021) in support of the constitutional role, mandate and independence of the Audit Office of the Republic of Cyprus (May 2021)
Franet, University of Nicosia and Symfiliosi (2023), Country research - Legal environment and space of civil society organisations in supporting fundamental rights – Cyprus, Vienna, EU Agency for Fundamental Rights https://fra.europa.eu/en/country-data/2023/civic-space-report-2023.
Financial Mirror (2022), Claims of conspiracy in Prisongate, 19 September 2022,
https://www.financialmirror.com/2022/09/19/claims-of-conspiracy-in-prisongate/
.
Financial Mirror (2023), 26 law firms audited in golden passport probe, 10 March 2023,
https://www.financialmirror.com/2023/03/10/26-law-firms-audited-in-golden-passport-probe/
.
Global Alliance of Human Rights Institutions (2022), Report and Recommendations of the Session of the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA), Geneva, 3-7 October 2022
GRECO (2016), Fourth Evaluation Round, Evaluation Report on Cyprus on Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors.
GRECO (2018), Fourth Evaluation Round - Compliance Report Cyprus.
GRECO (2020), Fourth Evaluation Round - Second Compliance Report Cyprus.
GRECO (2022), Fourth Evaluation Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on Cyprus.
Information Commissioner (2023), Written contribution from the Information Commissioner in the context of the country visit.
In-cyprus (2022), Law allows Transparency Commissioner to make public interventions, 1 November 2022,
https://in-cyprus.philenews.com/news/local/law-allows-transparency-commissioner-to-make-public-interventions/
.
International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) (2021), Statement by the INTOSAI development initiative following the potential independence challenges faced by the audit office of the republic of Cyprus, 24 February 2021, https://idi.no/elibrary/independent-sais/1182-idi-statement-cyprus-24-02-2021/file.
Kathimerini Cyprus (2023), Cyprus Land Development received 11.1 million from the passport program, 15 February 2023,
https://knews.kathimerini.com.cy/en/news/cyprus-land-development-received-11-1-million-from-the-passport-program#:~:text=The%20Cyprus%20Investment%20Program%2C%20also,Corporation%20between%202019%20and%202022
.
Ministry of Finance (2023), Written contribution from Ministry of Finance in the context of the country visit.
Ministry of Interior (2023), Written contribution received from the Ministry of Interior in the context of the country visit.
Ministry of Justice and Public Order (2023), Written contribution from the Ministry of Justice in the context of the country visit.
OECD (2020), Indicators of Regulatory Policy and Governance, Europe 2019-Greece.
OECD (2023), Indicators of Regulatory Policy and Governance, Europe 2022-Greece.
Office of the Commissioner for Administration and the Protection of Human Rights (2023), Impact of 2022 ENNHRI rule of law reporting.
Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (Cyprus) (2023), Written contribution from OCCRP (Cyprus) for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Oxygono (2023), Contribution from Oxygono for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Oxygono (2023), Written contribution from Oxygono in the context of the country visit.
Reporters Without Borders (2023), 2023 World Press Freedom Index.Supreme Court (2023), Contribution from the Supreme Court for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Schengen Visa Info (2023), Cyprus Has Revoked 222 Passports Granted Through Golden Passport Scheme So Far, 19 January 2023, https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/cyprus-has-revoked-222-passports-granted-through-golden-passport-scheme-so-far/
Supreme Court (2023), Written contribution from the Supreme Court in the context of the country visit.
UN Human Rights Regional Office for Europe (OHCHR) (2023), Contribution from OHCHR for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Union of Cypriot Journalists, Written contribution from the Union of Cypriot Journalists in the context of the country visit.
Annex II: Country visit to Cyprus
The Commission services held virtual meetings in April 2023 with:
·Association of European Journalists
·Association of Judges
·Audit Office
·Centre for the Rule of Law and European Values (CroLev)
·Civil Society Advocates
·Commissioner for Administration and the Protection of Human Rights
·Commissioner for Information
·Committee of Media Ethics Cyprus
·Cyprus Bar Association
·Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation
·Cyprus Judicial Training School
·Cyprus Integrity Forum
·Department of Judicial Reform, Supreme Court
·House of Representatives
·Independent Anti-Corruption Authority
·Institute for Mass Media (IMME)
·KISA
·Ministry of Finance
·Ministry of Interior
·Ministry of Justice and Public Order
·NGO Support Centre
·Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP)
·Office of the Attorney General
·OPEK
·Oxygono
·Police - Internal Affairs Service
·Police - Office of Investigation of Financial Crimes
·Radio-Television Authority
·Step up Stop Slavery
·Supreme Court
·Union of Cyprus Journalists (ESK)
* The Commission also met the following organisations in a number of horizontal meetings:
·ALDA (European Association for Local Democracy)
·Amnesty International
·Civil Liberties Union for Europe
·Civil Society Europe
·Culture Action Europe
·European Centre for Press and Media Freedom
·European Civic Forum
·European Federation of Journalists
·European Partnership for Democracy
·European Youth Forum
·Free Press Unlimited
·Front Line Defenders
·ILGA Europe
·International Commission of Jurists
·International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
·International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network
·International Press Institute
·JEF Europe
·Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa
·Philea
·Reporters Without Borders
·SOLIDAR
·Transparency International EU