This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 91999E000656
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 656/99 by Roberta ANGELILLI Closure of Parliament on account of a European farmers' demonstration
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 656/99 by Roberta ANGELILLI Closure of Parliament on account of a European farmers' demonstration
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 656/99 by Roberta ANGELILLI Closure of Parliament on account of a European farmers' demonstration
EÜT C 341, 29.11.1999, p. 138
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)
WRITTEN QUESTION No. 656/99 by Roberta ANGELILLI Closure of Parliament on account of a European farmers' demonstration
Official Journal C 341 , 29/11/1999 P. 0138
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0656/99 by Roberta Angelilli (NI) to the Commission (26 March 1999) Subject: Closure of Parliament on account of a European farmers' demonstration Prompted by the demonstration due to be staged in Brussels on Monday, 22 February 1999, in which farmers from all over Europe were intent on taking to the streets to protest against milk quotas, the Secretary-General of Parliament, Julian Priestley, issued a notice in which he informed staff that Parliament's offices would be closed, institutional business would cease, and the entire city of Brussels would be without public transport services and in effect under siege. Given that, by staging demonstrations, farmers are exercising their democratic rights, as they are entitled to do as citizens of the Union and, moreover, representatives of a major occupational group, and that a similar demonstration in Strasbourg on 10 February 1999 passed off without incident, can the Commission say: 1. whether it considers that the above measures were an exaggerated response and infringed the right of EU citizens to speak out and protest; 2. whether it considers that the measures were intended to thwart debate and joint discussion of farmers' problems; 3. whether it considers that the decision in question warrants a reprimand? Answer given by Mr Santer on behalf of the Commission (25 March 1999) The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its answer to her Written Question E-605/99(1). (1) OJ C 325, 12.11.1999, p. 124.