Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TA0456

Case T-456/10: Judgment of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Timab Industries and CFPR v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for animal feed phosphates — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Allocation of sales quotas, coordination of prices and conditions of sale and exchange of commercially sensitive information — Applicant’s withdrawal from the settlement procedure — Fines — Obligation to state reasons — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Cooperation — Failure to apply the likely range of fines indicated during the settlement procedure)

OJ C 221, 6.7.2015, p. 6–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

6.7.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/6


Judgment of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Timab Industries and CFPR v Commission

(Case T-456/10) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for animal feed phosphates - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Allocation of sales quotas, coordination of prices and conditions of sale and exchange of commercially sensitive information - Applicant’s withdrawal from the settlement procedure - Fines - Obligation to state reasons - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Cooperation - Failure to apply the likely range of fines indicated during the settlement procedure))

(2015/C 221/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Timab Industries (Dinard, France); and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) (Saint-Malo, France) (represented by: N. Lenoir and M. Truffier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, B. Mongin and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 5001 final of 20 July 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38866 — Animal feed phosphates), and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1)

Dismisses the action;

2)

Orders Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.


Top