This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007CB0525
Case C-525/07 P: Order of the Court of 28 November 2008 — Philippe Combescot v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Career development report — Duty to provide assistance — Mental harassment — Compensation for damage — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case C-525/07 P: Order of the Court of 28 November 2008 — Philippe Combescot v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Career development report — Duty to provide assistance — Mental harassment — Compensation for damage — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case C-525/07 P: Order of the Court of 28 November 2008 — Philippe Combescot v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Officials — Career development report — Duty to provide assistance — Mental harassment — Compensation for damage — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 69, 21.3.2009, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.3.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/13 |
Order of the Court of 28 November 2008 — Philippe Combescot v Commission of the European Communities
(Case C-525/07 P) (1)
(Appeal - Officials - Career development report - Duty to provide assistance - Mental harassment - Compensation for damage - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
(2009/C 69/21)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Philippe Combescot (represented by: A. Maritati and V. Messa, avvocati)
Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, Agent, and S. Corongiu, avocat)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 12 September 2007 in Case T-249/04 Combescot v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an application for, first, recognition that the conduct of the appellant's hierarchical superiors was unlawful; recognition that the appellant had the right to assistance; and annulment of the appellant's career development report for the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002; and, second, payment of compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the appellant.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Mr Combescot shall pay the costs of the appeal. |