This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023TA0568
Case T-568/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – August Storck v EUIPO (MiT FREUDE NASCHEN!) (EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark MiT FREUDE NASCHEN! – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
Case T-568/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – August Storck v EUIPO (MiT FREUDE NASCHEN!) (EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark MiT FREUDE NASCHEN! – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
Case T-568/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – August Storck v EUIPO (MiT FREUDE NASCHEN!) (EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark MiT FREUDE NASCHEN! – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
OJ C, C/2024/6098, 21.10.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6098/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/6098 |
21.10.2024 |
Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – August Storck v EUIPO (MiT FREUDE NASCHEN!)
(Case T-568/23) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark MiT FREUDE NASCHEN! - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/6098)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: August Storck KG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 July 2023 (Case R 539/2023-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C C/2023/231, 23.10.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6098/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)