This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CB0401
Case C-401/23, CARCDSF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Metz – France) – Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E … D … (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme – Purely internal situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-401/23, CARCDSF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Metz – France) – Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E … D … (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme – Purely internal situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-401/23, CARCDSF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Metz – France) – Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E … D … (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme – Purely internal situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C, C/2024/5397, 16.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5397/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/5397 |
16.9.2024 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Metz – France) – Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E … D …
(Case C-401/23, (1) CARCDSF)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme - Purely internal situation - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court - Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/5397)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Tribunal Judiciaire de Metz
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF)
Defendant: E … D …
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal judiciaire de Metz (France), made by decision of 26 May 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.
(1) OJ C C/2023/10.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5397/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)