Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2011:186:TOC

    Official Journal of the European Union, C 186, 25 June 2011


    Display all documents published in this Official Journal
     

    ISSN 1725-2423

    doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.186.eng

    Official Journal

    of the European Union

    C 186

    European flag  

    English edition

    Information and Notices

    Volume 54
    25 June 2011


    Notice No

    Contents

    page

     

    IV   Notices

     

    NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

     

    Court of Justice of the European Union

    2011/C 186/01

    Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 179, 18.6.2011

    1


     

    V   Announcements

     

    COURT PROCEEDINGS

     

    Court of Justice

    2011/C 186/02

    Case C-249/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tartu ringkonnakohus — Estonia) — Novo Nordisk AS v Ravimiamet (Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Advertising — Medical journal — Information not included in the summary of product characteristics)

    2

    2011/C 186/03

    Case C-267/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Free movement of capital — Articles 56 EC and 40 of the EEA Agreement — Restrictions — Direct taxation — Non-resident taxpayers — Obligation to appoint a tax representative)

    2

    2011/C 186/04

    Case C-305/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad — Recovery)

    3

    2011/C 186/05

    Case C-316/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH v Merckle GmbH (Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Prohibition on the advertising to the general public of medicinal products available only on prescription — Definition of ‘advertising’ — Information communicated to the competent authority — Information accessible on the internet)

    3

    2011/C 186/06

    Case C-375/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Republic of Poland) — Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele2 Polska sp. z o.o., now Netia SA (Competition — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 5 — Abuse of a dominant position — Powers of the competition authorities of the Member States to find that there has been no breach of Article 102 TFEU)

    4

    2011/C 186/07

    Case C-384/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris — France) — Prunus SARL, Polonium SA v Directeur des services fiscaux (Direct taxation — Free movement of capital — Article 64 TFEU — Legal persons established in a non-Member State — Ownership of immovable property located in a Member State — Tax on the market value of that property — Refusal of exemption — Assessment with regard to overseas countries and territories — Combating tax evasion — Joint and several liability)

    4

    2011/C 186/08

    Case C-434/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom)) — Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Freedom of movement for persons — Article 21 TFEU — Directive 2004/38/EC — ‘Beneficiary’ — Article 3(1) — National who has never made use of his right of free movement and has always resided in the Member State of his nationality — Effect of being a national of another Member State — Purely internal situation)

    5

    2011/C 186/09

    Case C-537/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal — United Kingdom) — Ralph James Bartlett, Natalio Gonzalez Ramos, Jason Michael Taylor v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Mobility component of Disability Living Allowance — Separate benefit — Special non-contributory benefit — Non-exportability)

    5

    2011/C 186/10

    Case C-137/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — European Communities v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (Articles 207(2) EC and 282 EC — Representation of the European Communities before the national courts — Powers conferred on the Commission — Delegation of the power of representation to other Community institutions — Conditions)

    6

    2011/C 186/11

    Case C-200/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Contract relating to Community support for a project in the context of the ‘eContent’ programme — Termination of the contract by the Commission — Reimbursement of eligible costs — Grounds of the judgment of the General Court)

    7

    2011/C 186/12

    Case C-206/10: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 4(1)(a) — Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 — Article 7(2) — German Länder benefits for the blind, the deaf and the disabled — Residence qualification)

    7

    2011/C 186/13

    Case C-265/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Chemicals — Registration, evaluation, authorisation of those substances and restrictions applicable to them — REACH Regulation — Article 126 — System of penalties in the event of infringement of the provisions of the REACH Regulation — Lack of implementation within the period prescribed)

    8

    2011/C 186/14

    Case C-61/11 PPU: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Trento — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Hassen El Dridi alias Karim Soufi (Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Articles 15 and 16 — National legislation providing for a prison sentence for illegally staying third-country nationals in the event of refusal to obey an order to leave the territory of a Member State — Compatibility)

    8

    2011/C 186/15

    Case C-258/10: Order of the Court of 4 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Dâmbovița — Romania) — Nicușor Grigore v Regia Națională a Pădurilor Romsilva — Direcția Silvică București (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Directive 2003/88/EC — Organisation of working time — Notion of ‘working time’ — ‘Notion ofmaximum weekly working time’ — Forest ranger subject, under the terms of his employment contract and the applicable collective agreement, to flexible working time of 8 hours per day and 40 hours per week — National legislation holding him liable for any damage suffered in the section of forest under his control — Classification — Effect of overtime on the remuneration and financial compensation of the person concerned)

    9

    2011/C 186/16

    Case C-273/10: Order of the Court of 18 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (Spain)) — David Montoya Medina v Fondo de Garantia Salarial and Universidad de Alicante (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work — Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector — Entitlement to triennial seniority bonuses — Principle of non-discrimination)

    10

    2011/C 186/17

    Case C-370/10 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Educa Borras SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative mark EDUCA Memory game — Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national and international word marks MEMORY — Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) — Relative grounds for refusal)

    10

    2011/C 186/18

    Case C-95/11: Action brought on 28 February 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark

    11

    2011/C 186/19

    Case C-132/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Austria) lodged on 18 March 2011 — Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH v Betriebsrat Bord der Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH

    11

    2011/C 186/20

    Case C-138/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria), lodged on 21 March 2011 — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich

    12

    2011/C 186/21

    Case C-153/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 March 2011 — OOD Klub v Director of the Varna Office ‘Appeals and the Administration of Enforcement’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite)

    12

    2011/C 186/22

    Case C-164/11: Action brought on 5 April 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

    13

    2011/C 186/23

    Case C-179/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 18 April 2011 — CIMADE, Groupe d’information et de soutien des immigrés (GISTI) v Ministre de l’Intérieur, de l’Outre-Mer, des Collectivités Territoriales et de l’Immigration

    13

    2011/C 186/24

    Case C-181/11 P: Appeal brought on 15 April 2011 by Compañía Española de Tabaco en Rama, S.A. (Cetarsa) against the judgment delivered on 3 February 2011 in Case T-33/05, Compañía Española de Tabaco en Rama, S.A. v European Commission

    14

    2011/C 186/25

    Case C-184/11: Action brought on 18 April 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

    14

    2011/C 186/26

    Case C-186/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 20 April 2011 — Stanleybet International Ltd, William Hill Organisation Ltd and William Hill plc v Ipourgos Ikonomias kai Ikonomikon and Ipourgos Politismou

    15

    2011/C 186/27

    Case C-189/11: Action brought on 20 April 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

    16

    2011/C 186/28

    Case C-198/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 April 2011 by Lan Airlines S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 February 2011 in Case T-194/09 Lan Airlines S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, S.A.

    16

    2011/C 186/29

    Case C-408/10: Order of the President of the Court of 1 March 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

    17

    2011/C 186/30

    Case C-517/10: Order of the President of the Court of 9 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias — Spain) — María Luisa Gómez Cueto v Administración del Estado

    17

    2011/C 186/31

    Case C-563/10: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany) — Kashayar Khavand v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    17

     

    General Court

    2011/C 186/32

    Case T-1/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Buczek Autmotive v Commission (State aid — Restructuring of the Polish steel industry — Recovery of public debts — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Concept of State aid — Private investor criterion)

    18

    2011/C 186/33

    Case T-145/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2011 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Atlas Air (ATLAS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community trade mark ATLAS — Earlier Benelux trade mark atlasair — Formal requirements — Lodging of a statement setting out the grounds for the action — Suspension of the administrative procedure — Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Rule 20(7) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

    18

    2011/C 186/34

    Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2011 — Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais and Communauté d'agglomération du Douasis v Commission (State aid — Construction of railway equipment — Repayable advances — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Alteration of heads of claim — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons — State resources — Whether State held responsible — Criterion of private investor — Undertaking in difficulties)

    19

    2011/C 186/35

    Case T-299/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Elf Aquitaine v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in sodium chlorate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA — Imputability of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Principle that penalties must fit the offence — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Presumption of innocence — Principle of sound administration — Principle of legal certainty — Misuse of powers — Fines — Aggravating circumstance — Deterrence — Mitigating circumstance — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value)

    19

    2011/C 186/36

    Case T-343/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Arkema France v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in sodium chlorate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — Aggravating circumstance — Repeat infringement — Mitigating circumstance — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value)

    20

    2011/C 186/37

    Case T-203/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (Olymp) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark OLYMP — Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    20

    2011/C 186/38

    Case T-204/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (OLYMP) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark OLYMP — Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    21

    2011/C 186/39

    Case T-341/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava and Others v OHIM (TXAKOLI) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community collective verbal mark TXAKOLI — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 66(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)

    21

    2011/C 186/40

    Case T-460/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — CheapFlights International v OHIM — Cheapflights (Cheapflights) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Cheapflights — Earlier national figurative mark CheapFlights — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    22

    2011/C 186/41

    Case T-461/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — CheapFlights International v OHIM — Cheapflights (Cheapflights with a black aeroplane) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Cheapflights with a black aeroplane — Earlier international figurative mark CheapFlights — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    22

    2011/C 186/42

    Case T-464/09: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2011 — Commission v New Acoustic Music and Hildibrandsdottir (Arbitration clause — Contract for financial assistance concluded under the ‘Culture 2000’ Framework Programme — Implementation of the action entitled ‘European Music Roadwork’ — Non-performance of the contract — Repayment of part of the amounts advanced — Partial inadmissibility of the action — Procedure by default — Legal aid)

    23

    2011/C 186/43

    Case T-488/09: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2011 — Jager & Polacek v OHIM (REDTUBE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark REDTUBE — Earlier unregistered national mark Redtube — Failure to pay the opposition fee within the prescribed period — Decision deeming the opposition non-existent — Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 — Protection of legitimate expectations — Rule 17 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Ex parte proceedings — Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 — Rule 18 of Regulation No 2868/95 — Legal nature of a communication from OHIM informing a party that an opposition has been found to be admissible — Rule of parallelism of procedural requirements and of the actus contrarius — Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    23

    2011/C 186/44

    Case T-7/10: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Diagnostiko kai Therapeftiko Kentro Athinon ‘Ygeia’ v OHIM (υγεία) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark υγεία — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character and descriptive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    24

    2011/C 186/45

    Case T-41/10: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — SIMS — École de ski internationale v OHIM — SNMSF (esf école du ski français) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark esf école du ski français — Absolute grounds for refusal — State emblem — Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 6ter of the Paris Convention — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009)

    24

    2011/C 186/46

    Case T-74/10: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2011 — Flaco Geräte v OHIM — Delgado Sámchez (FLACO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark FLACO — Earlier national word mark FLACO — Relative ground for refusal — Identical goods — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Request for proof of genuine use of the earlier mark submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

    25

    2011/C 186/47

    Case T-187/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2011 — Emram v OHIM — Guccio Gucci (G) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark G — Earlier national and Community figurative marks G — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    25

    2011/C 186/48

    Case T-402/09 P: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Rules on insurance against the risk of accident and occupational disease for officials of the European Communities — Procedure for the recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

    26

    2011/C 186/49

    Case T-195/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 May 2011 — Cahier and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission (Interim proceedings — Non-contractual liability — Application for interim measures — Inadmissible in part — Want of urgency)

    26

    2011/C 186/50

    Case T-197/11 P: Appeal brought on 1 April 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 January 2011 in Case F-121/07 Strack v Commission

    26

    2011/C 186/51

    Case T-203/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — Transports Schiocchet — Excursions v Council and Commission

    27

    2011/C 186/52

    Case T-205/11: Action brought on 7 April 2011 — Germany v Commission

    28

    2011/C 186/53

    Case T-209/11: Action brought on 5 April 2011 — MB System v Commission

    28

    2011/C 186/54

    Case T-215/11: Action brought on 12 April 2011 — ADEDI and Others v Council of the European Union

    29

    2011/C 186/55

    Case T-222/11: Action brought on 20 April 2011 — Rautenbach v Council and Commission

    29

    2011/C 186/56

    Case T-235/11: Action brought on 29 April 2011 — Spain v Commission

    30

    2011/C 186/57

    Case T-238/11 P: Appeal brought on 4 May 2011 by Luigi Marcuccio against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 February 2011 in Case F-81/09, Marcuccio v Commission

    31

    2011/C 186/58

    Case T-338/10: Order of the General Court of 13 May 2011 — Commission v Tornasol Films

    32

    2011/C 186/59

    Case T-88/11: Order of the General Court of 4 May 2011 — BIA Separations v Commission

    32

     

    European Union Civil Service Tribunal

    2011/C 186/60

    Case F-17/11: Action brought on 22 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

    33

    2011/C 186/61

    Case F-27/11: Action brought on 20 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

    33

    2011/C 186/62

    Case F-31/11: Action brought on 26 March 2011 — ZZ v CEDEFOP

    33

    2011/C 186/63

    Case F-40/11: Action brought on 5 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

    34

    2011/C 186/64

    Case F-42/11: Action brought on 9 April 2011 — Honnefelder v European Commission

    34

    2011/C 186/65

    Case F-44/11: Action brought on 13 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

    34

    2011/C 186/66

    Case F-45/11: Action brought on 14 April 2011 — ZZ v EIB

    35

    2011/C 186/67

    Case F-46/11: Action brought on 14 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

    35

    2011/C 186/68

    Case F-49/11: Action brought on 18 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

    36

    2011/C 186/69

    Case F-50/11: Action brought on 19 April 2011 — ZZ v Parliament

    36

    2011/C 186/70

    Case F-52/11: Action brought on 24 April 2011 — ZZ v EIB

    37

    2011/C 186/71

    Case F-53/11: Action brought on 2 May 2011 — ZZ v Commission

    37


    EN

     

    Top