EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/096/90

Corrigendum to the notice to the Official Journal in Case T-127/05 ( OJ C 56, 10.3.2007, p. 28 )

OJ C 96, 28.4.2007, p. 43–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.4.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/43


Corrigendum to the notice to the Official Journal in Case T-127/05

( ‘Official Journal of the European Union ’C 56, 10 March 2007, p. 28 )

(2007/C 96/90)

The notice to the OJ in Case T-127/05 Lootus Teine Osaühing v Council is to be read as follows:

‘Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 January 2007 — Lootus Teine Osaühing v Council

(Case T-127/05) (1)

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 - Fisheries - Fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 - Persons directly and individually concerned - Inadmissibility)

(2007/C 56/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lootus Teine Osaühing (Lootus) (Tartu, Estonia) (represented by: T. Sild and K. Martin, Lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Gregorio Merino, F. Ruggeri Laderchi and A. Westerhof Lörefflerova, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: L. Uibo, Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by K. Banks, Agent)

Re:

Action for annulment in part of, first, the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 of 20 December 2004 amending Regulations (EC) Nos 2340/2002 and 2347/2002 as concerns fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 (OJ 2004 L 396, p. 1) and, second, Part 2 of the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 of 22 December 2004 fixing for 2005 and 2006 the fishing opportunities for Community fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks (OJ 2004 L 396, p. 4), in so far as those provisions concern the fishing opportunities allocated to Estonia.

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council.

3.

The Commission shall bear its own costs.’


(1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005.


Top