EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0223
Case T-223/16: Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Massive Bionics v EUIPO — Apple (DriCloud)
Case T-223/16: Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Massive Bionics v EUIPO — Apple (DriCloud)
Case T-223/16: Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Massive Bionics v EUIPO — Apple (DriCloud)
OJ C 251, 11.7.2016, p. 39–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.7.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 251/39 |
Action brought on 5 May 2016 — Massive Bionics v EUIPO — Apple (DriCloud)
(Case T-223/16)
(2016/C 251/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Massive Bionics, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Galindo Martens, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Apple, Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States of America)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘DriCloud’ — Application for registration No 11 723 509
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 03/03/2016 in Case R 339/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order the defendants to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |