EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TN0344

Case T-344/15: Action brought on 1st July 2015 — French Republic v European Commission

OJ C 270, 17.8.2015, p. 39–40 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20150731058617092015/C 270/493442015TC27020150817EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20150701394021

Case T-344/15: Action brought on 1st July 2015 — French Republic v European Commission

Top

C2702015EN3910120150701EN0049391402

Action brought on 1st July 2015 — French Republic v European Commission

(Case T-344/15)

2015/C 270/49Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: F. Alabrune, G. de Bergues, D. Colas and F. Fize, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant requests the court to:

annul the decision of the European Commission GESTDEM 2014/6046 of 21 April 2015 concerning the confirmatory application for access pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001, regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents;

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 ( 1 ), which provides that a Member State may request an institution not to disclose a document originating from that Member State without its prior agreement.

2.

Second plea in law, in the alternative, alleging infringement of the obligation to give reasons concerning the non-application of the exception provided at the third indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.

3.

Third plea in law, in the further alternative, alleging infringement of the second and third indents of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. The applicant contends that the Commission could have refused access to the documents sent by the French authorities in accordance with the procedure provided in Directive 98/34/EC ( 2 ), in so far as that procedure would constitute an investigation within the meaning of the article cited above.


( 1 ) Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

( 2 ) Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37).

Top