EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/056/53
Case T-472/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 January 2007 — Tsarnavas v Commission (Officials — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Promotion — Judgment annulling the decision not to promote the applicant — Re-examination of the merits — Reasons)
Case T-472/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 January 2007 — Tsarnavas v Commission (Officials — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Promotion — Judgment annulling the decision not to promote the applicant — Re-examination of the merits — Reasons)
Case T-472/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 January 2007 — Tsarnavas v Commission (Officials — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Promotion — Judgment annulling the decision not to promote the applicant — Re-examination of the merits — Reasons)
OJ C 56, 10.3.2007, p. 27–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
10.3.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 56/27 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 January 2007 — Tsarnavas v Commission
(Case T-472/04) (1)
(Officials - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Promotion - Judgment annulling the decision not to promote the applicant - Re-examination of the merits - Reasons)
(2007/C 56/53)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Vassilios Tsarnavas (Volos, Greece) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communties (represented by: G. Berardis-Kayser and D. Martin, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 23 December 2003 insofar as it did not include the applicant's name on the list of officials proposed for promotion for 1999, or on the list of officials considered the most deserving of promotion to grade A4 for 1998 and 1999, or on the list of officials promoted to grade A4 in 1998 or 1999
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Commission of 23 December 2003 insofar as it did not include the applicant's name on the list of officials considered the most deserving of promotion to grade A4 for 1998 and 1999, on the one hand, or on the list of officials promoted to grade A4 in 1998 or 1999, on the other; |
2. |
Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
3. |
Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |