This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/294/32
Case C-93/05: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korsholms tingsrätt — Finland) — Teemu Hakala v Oy L. Simons Transport Ab (Second subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Question the answer to which admits of no reasonable doubt — Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 — Harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport — Payments to wage-earning drivers related to distances covered — Prohibition of such a pay scheme unless it does not endanger road safety)
Case C-93/05: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korsholms tingsrätt — Finland) — Teemu Hakala v Oy L. Simons Transport Ab (Second subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Question the answer to which admits of no reasonable doubt — Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 — Harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport — Payments to wage-earning drivers related to distances covered — Prohibition of such a pay scheme unless it does not endanger road safety)
Case C-93/05: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korsholms tingsrätt — Finland) — Teemu Hakala v Oy L. Simons Transport Ab (Second subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Question the answer to which admits of no reasonable doubt — Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 — Harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport — Payments to wage-earning drivers related to distances covered — Prohibition of such a pay scheme unless it does not endanger road safety)
OJ C 294, 2.12.2006, p. 19–19
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
2.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 294/19 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korsholms tingsrätt — Finland) — Teemu Hakala v Oy L. Simons Transport Ab
(Case C-93/05) (1)
(Second subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Question the answer to which admits of no reasonable doubt - Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 - Harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport - Payments to wage-earning drivers related to distances covered - Prohibition of such a pay scheme unless it does not endanger road safety)
(2006/C 294/32)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Korsholms tingsrätt
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Teemu Hakala
Defendant: Oy L. Simons Transport Ab
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Korsholms tingsrätt — Interpretation of Article 10 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport (OJ 1985 L 370, p. 1) — Payments to a wage-earning driver based on distances covered
Operative part of the order
A pay scheme based on distances covered is contrary to Article 10 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport, unless such a scheme is of a kind as not to endanger road safety. It is for the national court to ascertain, in view of all the circumstances of the case in the main proceedings, whether that is the case.