This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62025CN0598
Case C-598/25 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2025 by Kurt Hesse against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) delivered on 02 July 2025 in Case T-1104/23, Ferrari v EUIPO – Hesse (TESTAROSSA)
Case C-598/25 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2025 by Kurt Hesse against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) delivered on 02 July 2025 in Case T-1104/23, Ferrari v EUIPO – Hesse (TESTAROSSA)
Case C-598/25 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2025 by Kurt Hesse against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) delivered on 02 July 2025 in Case T-1104/23, Ferrari v EUIPO – Hesse (TESTAROSSA)
OJ C, C/2026/1060, 2.3.2026, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/1060/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2026/1060 |
2.3.2026 |
Appeal brought on 10 September 2025 by Kurt Hesse against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) delivered on 02 July 2025 in Case T-1104/23, Ferrari v EUIPO – Hesse (TESTAROSSA)
(Case C-598/25 P)
(C/2026/1060)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Kurt Hesse (represented by: M. Krogmann, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: Ferrari SpA, European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 19 January 2026, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that appellant should bear his own costs.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/1060/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)