Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62025CB0163

Case C-163/25, Sadalbari: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Romania) – SC Sadalbari SRL v Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară, Sectorul Instrumentelor şi Investiţiilor Financiare (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Response which may be clearly deduced from the case-law – Markets in financial instruments – Directive 2004/39/EC – Article 4(1)(14) – Definition of regulated market – Authorisation – Functional requirements – Market administered, following a merger, by a legal person also administering a regulated market – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)

OJ C, C/2025/6148, 24.11.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6148/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6148/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2025/6148

24.11.2025

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Romania) – SC Sadalbari SRL v Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară, Sectorul Instrumentelor şi Investiţiilor Financiare

(Case C-163/25,  (1) Sadalbari)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Response which may be clearly deduced from the case-law - Markets in financial instruments - Directive 2004/39/EC - Article 4(1)(14) - Definition of ‘regulated market’ - Authorisation - Functional requirements - Market administered, following a merger, by a legal person also administering a regulated market - Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)

(C/2025/6148)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Sadalbari SRL

Defendant: Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară, Sectorul Instrumentelor şi Investiţiilor Financiare

Operative part of the order

Article 4(1)(14) and Article 36(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC,

must be interpreted as meaning that a market in financial instruments which has not been authorised as a ‘regulated market’, within the meaning of that directive, or which does not fulfil the other conditions laid down by the provisions in Title III of that directive does not constitute a ‘regulated market’ within the meaning of that directive.


(1)  Date lodged: 27.02.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6148/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top