Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0077

Case T-77/23: Action brought on 16 February 2023 — Jaw de Croon v CPVO — Belgicactus (Belsemred1)

OJ C 121, 3.4.2023, pp. 13–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

3.4.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/13

Action brought on 16 February 2023 — Jaw de Croon v CPVO — Belgicactus (Belsemred1)

(Case T-77/23)

(2023/C 121/18)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Jaw de Croon Holding BV (Apeldoorn, Netherlands) (represented by: T. Overdijk, lawyer)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Belgicactus BVBA (Westerlo, Belgium)

Details of the proceedings before CPVO

Proprietor of the Community plant variety right at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community plant variety right at issue: Community Plant Variety Right Belsemred1

Procedure before CPVO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of CPVO of 16 December 2022 in Case A024/2021

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul or set aside the contested decision;

—

order the CPVO to declare the Community Plant Variety Right granted to ‘Belsemred1’ null and void; or alternatively, order the CPVO to undertake further evidence taking on issues to be identified by the General Court;

—

Order the CPVO to bear its own costs and pay and/or reimburse the costs of these proceedings incurred by the Appellant in accordance with applicable rules.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of essential procedural requirements;

—

Infringement of Regulation (EU) 2100/94 of the Council or any rule of law relating to their application, including the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Top