This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TA0352
Case T-352/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2023 — De Dietrich Process Systems v EUIPO — Koch-Glitsch (KARR) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark KARR — Absolute ground for invalidity — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-352/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2023 — De Dietrich Process Systems v EUIPO — Koch-Glitsch (KARR) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark KARR — Absolute ground for invalidity — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-352/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2023 — De Dietrich Process Systems v EUIPO — Koch-Glitsch (KARR) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark KARR — Absolute ground for invalidity — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 94, 13.3.2023, p. 37–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.3.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 94/37 |
Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2023 — De Dietrich Process Systems v EUIPO — Koch-Glitsch (KARR)
(Case T-352/22) (1)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark KARR - Absolute ground for invalidity - Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2023/C 94/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: De Dietrich Process Systems GmbH (Mainz, Germany) (represented by: M. Körner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and T. Klee, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Koch-Glitsch LP (Wichita, Kansas, United States)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2022 (Case R 1105/2021-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 April 2022 (Case R 1105/2021-1); |
|
2. |
Orders EUIPO to bear the costs. |