Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CA0287

    Case C-287/22, Getin Noble Bank (Suspension or performance of a credit agreement): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — YQ, RJ v Getin Noble Bank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Mortgage loan indexed to a foreign currency — Article 6(1) — Article 7(1) — Application for interim measures — Suspension of performance of the loan agreement — Ensuring full effectiveness of the restitutory effect)

    OJ C 271, 31.7.2023, p. 7–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    31.7.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 271/7


    Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — YQ, RJ v Getin Noble Bank S.A.

    (Case C-287/22, (1) Getin Noble Bank (Suspension or performance of a credit agreement))

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Directive 93/13/EEC - Mortgage loan indexed to a foreign currency - Article 6(1) - Article 7(1) - Application for interim measures - Suspension of performance of the loan agreement - Ensuring full effectiveness of the restitutory effect)

    (2023/C 271/09)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Referring court

    Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: YQ, RJ

    Defendant: Getin Noble Bank S.A.

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, read in the light of the principle of effectiveness,

    must be interpreted as precluding national case-law according to which a national court may dismiss an application for the grant of interim measures lodged by a consumer seeking the suspension, pending a final decision on the invalidity of the loan agreement concluded by that consumer on the ground that that loan agreement contains unfair terms, of the payment of the monthly instalments due under that loan agreement, where the grant of those interim measures is necessary to ensure the full effectiveness of that decision.


    (1)  OJ C 318. 22.8.2022.


    Top