This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0536
Case T-536/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Belaeronavigatsia v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus — Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists — Concept of ‘person responsible for repression’ — Error of assessment — Proportionality)
Case T-536/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Belaeronavigatsia v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus — Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists — Concept of ‘person responsible for repression’ — Error of assessment — Proportionality)
Case T-536/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Belaeronavigatsia v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus — Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists — Concept of ‘person responsible for repression’ — Error of assessment — Proportionality)
OJ C 127, 11.4.2023, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
11.4.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 127/33 |
Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Belaeronavigatsia v Council
(Case T-536/21) (1)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus - Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists - Concept of ‘person responsible for repression’ - Error of assessment - Proportionality)
(2023/C 127/40)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Belaeronavigatsia (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Meyer and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and M. Carpus Carcea, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1001 of 21 June 2021 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2021 L 219 I, p. 67), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/999 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2021 L 219 I, p. 55), of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/307 of 24 February 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 97), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/300 of 24 February 2022 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Belaeronavigatsia to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
3. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |