This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0093
Case T-93/21: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2022 — Creaticon v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE — Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-93/21: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2022 — Creaticon v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE — Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-93/21: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2022 — Creaticon v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE — Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 266, 11.7.2022, p. 22–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.7.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 266/22 |
Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2022 — Creaticon v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE)
(Case T-93/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE - Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 266/25)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Creaticon d.o.o. (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: P. Krmpotić, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and modification of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 December 2020 (Case R 847/2020-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Creaticon d.o.o. to pay the costs. |