Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021CN0327

    Case C-327/21 P: Appeal brought on 25 May 2021 by Giro Travel Company SRL against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 24 March 2021 in Case T-193/18, Andreas Stihl v EUIPO

    OJ C 37, 24.1.2022, p. 4–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.1.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 37/4

    Appeal brought on 25 May 2021 by Giro Travel Company SRL against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 24 March 2021 in Case T-193/18, Andreas Stihl v EUIPO

    (Case C-327/21 P)

    (2022/C 37/04)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: Giro Travel Company SRL (represented by: C. N. Frisch, avocat)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

    By order of 26 November 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Giro Travel Company SRL should bear its own costs.

    Top