This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0756
Case T-756/20: Action brought on 21 December 2020 — Nissan Motor v EUIPO — VDL Groep (VDL E-POWERED)
Case T-756/20: Action brought on 21 December 2020 — Nissan Motor v EUIPO — VDL Groep (VDL E-POWERED)
Case T-756/20: Action brought on 21 December 2020 — Nissan Motor v EUIPO — VDL Groep (VDL E-POWERED)
OJ C 53, 15.2.2021, p. 62–63
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.2.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 53/62 |
Action brought on 21 December 2020 — Nissan Motor v EUIPO — VDL Groep (VDL E-POWERED)
(Case T-756/20)
(2021/C 53/78)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Nissan Motor Co. Ltd (Yokohama-shi, Japan) (represented by: P. Martini-Berthon, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VDL Groep BV (Eindhoven, Netherlands)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark VDL E-POWERED — Application for registration No 17 895 699
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2020 in Case R 2915/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
allow the present applicant for annulment; |
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |