This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0251
Case T-251/20: Action brought on 4 May 2020 — KG v Parliament
Case T-251/20: Action brought on 4 May 2020 — KG v Parliament
Case T-251/20: Action brought on 4 May 2020 — KG v Parliament
OJ C 247, 27.7.2020, p. 17–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 247/17 |
Action brought on 4 May 2020 — KG v Parliament
(Case T-251/20)
(2020/C 247/26)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: KG (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the Parliament’s decision dated 4 February 2020 rejecting her complaint of 29 November 2019: |
|
— |
annul, if need be, the Parliament’s decision dated 30 August 2019 rejecting her initial request of 4 April 2019; |
|
— |
order the defendant to compensate the applicant for non-material damage estimated, ex æquo et bono, at the sum of EUR 5 000; |
|
— |
order the defendant to reimburse to the applicant all the legal costs incurred and the fees of the applicant’s retained legal counsel. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging the misinterpretation of Article 20(3) of Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations and the breach of the principle of continuity of service. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging breach of the principles of legitimate expectations and acquired rights. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging breach of the right to a good administration and of the duty of care. |