EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CA0249
Case C-249/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 November 2021 — European Commission v UG (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Contract of indefinite duration — Termination — Grounds for termination — Distortion — Non-material damage — Admissibility — Failure to rule on a head of claim)
Case C-249/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 November 2021 — European Commission v UG (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Contract of indefinite duration — Termination — Grounds for termination — Distortion — Non-material damage — Admissibility — Failure to rule on a head of claim)
Case C-249/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 November 2021 — European Commission v UG (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Contract of indefinite duration — Termination — Grounds for termination — Distortion — Non-material damage — Admissibility — Failure to rule on a head of claim)
OJ C 51, 31.1.2022, p. 9–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
31.1.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 51/9 |
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 November 2021 — European Commission v UG
(Case C-249/20 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Contract staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Termination - Grounds for termination - Distortion - Non-material damage - Admissibility - Failure to rule on a head of claim)
(2022/C 51/10)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: UG (represented by: initially by: M. Richard and P. Junqueira de Oliveira, subsequently by: M. Richard, avocats)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 2 April 2020, UG v Commission (T-571/17, not published, EU:T:2020:141) in so far as it annulled the European Commission’s decision of 17 October 2016 to terminate UG’s contract of employment of indefinite duration, found the existence of an illegality capable of giving rise to that institution’s liability and rejected as inadmissible UG’s head of claim seeking compensation for her non-material damage; |
|
2. |
Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
|
3. |
Reserves the costs. |