This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0325
Case T-325/18: Action brought on 28 May 2018 — VI.TO. v EUIPO — Bottega (Shape of a pink bottle)
Case T-325/18: Action brought on 28 May 2018 — VI.TO. v EUIPO — Bottega (Shape of a pink bottle)
Case T-325/18: Action brought on 28 May 2018 — VI.TO. v EUIPO — Bottega (Shape of a pink bottle)
OJ C 268, 30.7.2018, p. 40–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-325/18: Action brought on 28 May 2018 — VI.TO. v EUIPO — Bottega (Shape of a pink bottle)
Action brought on 28 May 2018 — VI.TO. v EUIPO — Bottega (Shape of a pink bottle)
(Case T-325/18)
2018/C 268/49Language in which the application was lodged: ItalianParties
Applicant: Vinicola Tombacco (VI.TO.) Srl (Trebaseleghe, Italy) (represented by: L. Giove, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sandro Bottega (Colle Umberto, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union three-dimensional mark (Shape of a pink bottle) – European Union trade mark No 12 309 795
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2018 in Case R 1037/2017-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Incorrect assessment of the ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Incorrect assessment of the ground for refusal laid down in Article 7(1)(e)(i), (ii) and (iii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |